▲ 205 ▼ The myth of "consensual" internet (europe.pub) submitted 11 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] critical@reddthat.com -9 points 11 months ago (27 children) Did you really use AI for this?! permalink fedilink source hideshow 27 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 11 months ago (24 children) lol I just found it, I have no idea what was used to make it, why does it matter even? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children) Because Lemmy is full smash-the-looms luddite about AI art. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] barubary@infosec.exchange 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Do you think the Luddites were wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's. Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up) permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (19 replies) load more comments (21 replies) load more comments (23 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 16 points 11 months ago (24 children) lol I just found it, I have no idea what was used to make it, why does it matter even? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children) Because Lemmy is full smash-the-looms luddite about AI art. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] barubary@infosec.exchange 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Do you think the Luddites were wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's. Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up) permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (19 replies) load more comments (21 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children) Because Lemmy is full smash-the-looms luddite about AI art. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] barubary@infosec.exchange 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Do you think the Luddites were wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's. Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up) permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (19 replies)
[–] barubary@infosec.exchange 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Do you think the Luddites were wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's. Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's. Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up) permalink fedilink source parent