you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 11 months ago (27 children)

Did you really use AI for this?!

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 11 months ago (24 children)

    lol I just found it, I have no idea what was used to make it, why does it matter even?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children)

    Because Lemmy is full smash-the-looms luddite about AI art.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Do you think the Luddites were wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago*

    If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's.

    Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (19 replies)
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • load more comments (23 replies)