this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
600 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

77144 readers
2390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
600
OpenAI needs to raise at least $207bn by 2030 so it can continue to lose money, HSBC estimates (www.ft.com)
submitted 4 days ago by cyrano@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Alphaville is free access. Just create a free account.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PullPantsUnsworn@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I am a developer. While AI is being marketed as snake oil, the things they can do is astonishing. One example is it reviews code a lot better than human beings. It's not just finding obvious errors but it catches logical error that no human would have caught.

I see people are just forming two groups. Those who thinks AI will solve everything and those who thinks AI is useless. Neither of them are right.

[–] teohhanhui@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

One example is it reviews code a lot better than human beings. It’s not just finding obvious errors but it catches logical error that no human would have caught.

No, it does not.

Source: Open-source contributor who's constantly annoyed by the useless CodeRabbit AI that some open source projects have chosen to use.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s not just finding obvious errors but it catches logical error that no human would have caught.

I'm not having the same experience.

[–] mirshafie -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe reconsider which model you're using?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If there was a model that coded perfectly then there wouldn't be a plurality of models. There would just be THE model.

It's like companies having competing math formulas for structural engineering where some work and others don't. It's insanity.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And how many errors is it creating that we don't know about? You're using AI to review code but then someone has to review what the AI did because they fuck up.

If humans code something, then humans can troubleshoot and fix it. It's on our level. But how are you going to fix a gigantic complicated tangle of vibe code that AI makes and only AI understands? Make a better AI to fix it? Again and again? Just get the AI to code another system from scratch every month? This shit is not sustainable.