this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
458 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

34444 readers
1978 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miguel@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I was told something like this about an article I was pointing out wasn't on page 1 of google, but was on virtually all other engines. "Unless it's page 1 of google nobody cares"

And all I can say is "who cares? those aren't the people it's for"

[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I agree, I do the same. But the second part of your reply « who cares those aren’t the guys », years and years watching the fediverse trying to kickstart the whole thing proves it wrong . We, fediverse users, do need those people onboard

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The mass protests against Threads leads me to believe that is actually the opposite of the truth.

[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well that’s actually a great thing: many instances will defederate/block thread, some will federate. Freedom of choice

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok but that contradicts your previous comment

[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

I don’t see why, it’s simple as much as I enjoy the fediverse ideology the current status of this part of internet show how little it is relevant the the vast majority of people. And yet it’s a good thing to allow both fediverse purists and ones that don’t care connecting with the « others » social networks live together.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)