this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
76 points (90.4% liked)

Fediverse

33086 readers
542 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

๐Ÿงฎ Decentralization Scoring System (v1.0)

This scoring system evaluates how decentralized and self-hostable a platform is, based on four core metrics.

๐Ÿ“Š Scoring Metrics (Total: 100 Points)

Top Provider User Share (30 points): Measures how many users are on the largest instance. Full points if <10%; 0 if >80%.
Top Provider Content Share (30 points): Measures how much content is hosted by the largest instance. Full points if <10%; 0 if >80%.
Ease of Self-Hosting: Server (20 points): Technical ease of running your own backend. Full points for Docker/simple setup with good docs.
Ease of Self-Hosting: User Interface (20 points): Availability and usability of clients. Full points for accessible, FOSS, multi-platform clients.


๐Ÿ“‹ Example Breakdown (Estimates)

๐Ÿ“ง Email (2025)

  • Top Provider User Share: Apple โ‰ˆ 53.67% โ†’ Score: 4.5/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Apple likely handles >50% of mail โ†’ Score: 4.5/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Leverage email hosting services) โ†’ Score: 18/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Easy (Thunderbird, K-9, etc.) โ†’ Score: 18/20

Total: 45/100


๐Ÿน Lemmy (2025)

  • Top Provider User Share: lemmy.world โ‰ˆ 37.17% โ†’ Score: 12/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: lemmy.world likely hosts ~37% content โ†’ Score: 12/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Docker, low resource) โ†’ Score: 18/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Good FOSS apps, web UI โ†’ Score: 18/20

Total: 60/100


๐Ÿ˜ Mastodon (2025)

  • Top Provider User Share: mastodon.social โ‰ˆ 42.7% โ†’ Score: 11/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: mastodon.social โ‰ˆ 45โ€“50% content โ†’ Score: 10/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Docker setup, moderate difficulty โ†’ Score: 15/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Strong ecosystem (Tusky, web, etc.) โ†’ Score: 19/20

Total: 55/100


๐Ÿ”ต Bluesky (2025)

  • Top Provider User Share: bsky.social โ‰ˆ ~90%+ (very centralized) โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Nearly all content on bsky.social โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: PDS hosting possible but very niche โ†’ Score: 4/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Mostly official client; some 3rd party โ†’ Score: 10/20

Total: 14/100


๐ŸŸฅ Reddit (2025)

  • Top Provider User Share: Reddit โ‰ˆ 48.4% โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Reddit hosts a significant portion of user-generated content โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Not self-hostable (proprietary platform) โ†’ Score: 0/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Some unofficial clients available โ†’ Score: 3/20

Total: 3/100


How Scores are Calculated

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘ How User/Content Share Scores Work

This measures how many users are on the largest provider (or instance).

  • 100% (one provider): If one provider has all the users, it gets 0 points.
  • No provider > 10%: If no provider has more than 10%, it gets full 30 points.
  • Between 10% and 80%: Anything in between is scored on a linear scale.
  • > 80%: If a provider has more than 80%, it gets 0 points.

๐Ÿ“Š Formula:

Score = 30 ร— (1 - (TopProviderShare - 10%) / 70%)
โ€ฆbut only if TopProviderShare is between 10% and 80%.
If below 10%, full 30. If above 80%, zero.

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:

If one provider has 40% of all users:
โ†’ Score = 30 ร— (1 - (40 - 10) / 70) = 30 ร— (1 - 0.43) = 17.1 points

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ How Ease of Self-Hosting Scores Work

These scores measure how easy it is for individuals or communities to run their own servers or use clients.

This looks at how technically easy it is to run your own backend (e.g., email server, Mastodon server) or User Interface (e.g., web-interface or mobile-app)

  • Very Easy: One-command Docker, low resources, great documentation โ†’ 18โ€“20 points
  • Moderate: Docker or manual setup, some config, active community support โ†’ 13โ€“17 points
  • Hard: Complex setup, needs regular updates or custom config (e.g. DNS, spam) โ†’ 6โ€“12 points
  • Very Hard or Proprietary: Little to no self-hosting support, undocumented โ†’ 0โ€“5 points

PS.

This is Version 1.0 so there are likely flaws and mistakes in it, feel free to help create the best version we can I've put it on https://github.com/NoBadDays/decentralization-score

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Snoopy@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can limit it to social network. I class peertube, pixelfed as a media plateform rather a social network one.

For migration, can i migrate my account with :

  • My followers and giving them my new adress ? Do it update itself or do we have to do it ?
  • my contents : communities, bookmark, posts, comments...
  • can i delete my account ? Can i delete all my content ? and how easy it is ? There we will see Meta doing an amazing score.
  • bonus : can i export settings as colors scheme ? (Accessibility for visually impaired)
  • can i give community to new mod ? Can i fork it ?

And let's add accessibility. :)
We don't talk much about it and we are doing a very bad job. So the scoring system should also raise this issue : how accessible is the decentralized software.