this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
83 points (98.8% liked)

World News

54843 readers
2210 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Police say blaze tore through crowded bar where people were seeing in the new year

About 40 people are believed to have been killed and 100 injured after a fire tore through a crowded bar during a New Year’s Eve party in the Swiss ski resort of Crans-Montana, according to the Italian foreign ministry.

Swiss police confirmed several dozen partygoers were dead. The victims could not be immediately identified because of the severity of their burns, the ministry said. It confirmed arson was not responsible, with the blaze thought to be the result of an accident.

“There has been an explosion of unknown origin,” Gaëtan Lathion, a police spokesperson in the canton of Valais in south-west Switzerland, told Agence France-Presse. “There are several injured and several dead.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

According to an eyewitness, someone held a champagne bottle with a burning Roman candle in it too close to the ceiling (iirc she was already high up on someone's shoulders), causing a quick deflagration through the wooden structure.

Here's an article with a picture showing the sparks igniting what seems to be very shoddily installed, uncovered isolation foam.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have held off commenting on this disaster since I could not understand what happened to get so many killed.

Having seen the photo The Guardian published, I can now comment. "Egg rack" insulation foam (likely polyethylene or polyurethane foam or something comparably combustive) - added to the ceiling to achieve favourable sound absorption for performing music - is incredibly dangerous.

For a fast chemical reaction, you need:

  • material that melts easily
  • large surface area and porosity (coned foam is porous and has large surface area)

Contributors to the casualty numbers likely were: narrow exit passage, overpopulation, intoxicated people. Sadly I suspect that a considerable number of victims died due to crowd crush. If 200 people are trying to evacuate a space and one stumbles on the stairs, crowd crush is what follows, and very few get to evacuate after that. :(

Condolences to friends and family. I hope that injured people will heal. Criminal liability for the installers of the material seems almost inevitable.

If you see a music venue that accommodates more than a handful guests practising egg rack foam, tell them to remove it unless they can prove it's fire retardant. If they don't, sadly I must advise contacting a local fire department preventively, to have such materials removed. A note about styrofoams: most of them are a class F material from a fire safety perspective - almost as bad. Needs to be covered with something from a far higher fire resistance class.

Notes: combustion test of PU foam, untreated vs. fire retardant

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

Oh-shit! That photo is going to be 'exhibit A' at someone's manslaughter trial.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Ah, insulation foam would do it! Explains the dripping fire effect too.

Everyone was talking about all the wood in there, but I couldn't see how that would have started it that easily.

Would have thought it would have had sprinklers though...