this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
105 points (96.5% liked)

World News

51927 readers
2833 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.K. ministers are warning Elon Musk's X it faces a ban if it doesn't get its act together. But outlawing the social media platform is easier said than done.

The U.K.'s communications regulator Ofcom on Monday launched a formal investigation into a deluge of non-consensual sexualized deepfakes produced by X's AI chatbot Grok amid growing calls for action from U.K. politicians.

It will determine whether the creation and distribution of deepfakes on the platform, which have targeted women and children, constitutes a breach of the company’s duties under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act (OSA).

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What have they actually got to lose in doing so?

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The US has threatened sanctions if they do.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's Monday. The US threatens sanctions every Monday.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

And on every day that ends with a y.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most government PR run on major socmed platform due to the amount of reach the platform have, so if they have to ban X they have to migrate themselves and their citizen first. Banning X today could actually cost them next election, and they're actually getting unpopular. Elon know this, that's why they don't think they need to change anything because it's mostly just bark.

Or at least that's what i thought, would love them to prove me wrong.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They could ban grok and fine Twitter.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course they can, but the topic on hand is "what would they lose if they ban X".

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, ok. You haven’t read the article. They risk losing an election, as they use social media for self promotion and messaging. If theban twitter, they risk other being able to take their lead and they only have a small margin.