Mildly Interesting

24994 readers

611 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

111

Every shuffle of a deck of cards is most likely unique (europe.pub)

submitted 2 days ago by skepller@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In fact, 99.999999% is an extremely low estimate. The number of ways that a deck of cards can be shuffled is 52! Which is equal to 8065817517094387857166063685640376697528950544088327782400000000000 possibilities.

If you shuffled cards every second from the birth of the universe until now, you still wouldn’t even come close (statistically) to getting the same arrangement twice.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42773245

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the deck began its life randomly sorted, would the statistic be true then?

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From a production point of view I think that it would be very difficult (which generally means expensive) to create a randomised deck while ensuring that the deck has all 52 cards in it (although I’m just thinking aloud and have no experience in this area so could be wrong)

However, if the starting deck is truly random then the output of the shuffle would also be random so there wouldn’t be a bell curve.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks. It’s an interesting nugget of info but I want to understand it as much as possible before sharing it.