Ubisoft always had such a team for AC at least. AC Origins had a pretty good story and AC Odyssey was alright. Haven't finished or played the newer ones yet so I can't judge those yet but if there's one thing Ubisoft does right, it's that.

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AC Origins was a return to form for them, since the Brotherhood days (great story, glitchy climbing and parkour). They trusted that their main historical protagonist would thrive, so the story they told was solid. AC Odyssey had issues because they didn't trust in Cassandra being the historical MC; Alexios felt like an added on character because they thought a female lead wouldn't sell well. The more recent games were mid because the narratives felt kinda messy; I watched a play through of Valhalla in parts it wasn't great, Mirage had a lukewarm response, and AC Shadows had some writing issues (two MCs go from having beef to suddenly trusting one another two hours in). Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed team has fallen asleep at the wheel, the storytelling isn't quite up to snuff with the latest games.

I feel the modern world story should've been resolved, as it interferes with quasi historically accurate storyline (one can only approximate in these situations, we will never have the full truth as it's lost to time). The modern world story has dragged on for far too long and needs to be put to rest; we need a game set purely in the modern era, to resolve what is happening. I'd love to see AC games that spin into exploring approximated history, without the burden of a world ending in slow-motion...

If only Ubisoft actually cared.

[–] KokoSabreScruffy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Valhalla is such a weird beast in the narrative. I just completed the base main story and then end was kinda.. awkward.

At the end of it I still havent uncovered the leader of the order, hell I think less than half of the members are part of the main story. I like that each region was its own thing and the pacing was fine though in writing nothing was really groundbreaking. Replacing side quests with the smaller mysteries was also a good decision but OH MY LORD, can we be done with the modern world or maybe get a team to release a walking sim that resolves it and just go make "historically" - based games with checklist open world.

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, when I was watching Valhalla I noticed the strangeness of the narrative...They did try something different, making each region a self-contained story. The pacing wasn't terrible either, it's just that they didn't try hard enough to make certain areas of the game better. That's what hurt Valhalla in my opinion, the wealth of very average writing; the fact they had smaller mysteries could've been awesome had it been better executed. Ironically, that's similar to how Odyssey handles the cult; you don't figure out the leader until the post game, after killing cultists who weren't part of the main story. I feel Valhalla's story structure was inspired by Odyssey, most regions have their own self-contained story that connects to the overarching story. Except Valhalla goes for smaller mysteries in place of the overwhelming amount of Side Quest that Odyssey has (still not finished with half of them, thankfully they can be done post game).

I feel the modern world story should be handled with a bit of care, to make that a particularly memorable experience. Going out with a bang is better than ending on a whimper. Walking sims aren't bad in their own right, but Ubisoft wouldn't let a writing and dev team handle it with the care it needs (not until they figure out why Larian Studios is so beloved).