this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
770 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

11592 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Does Iran actually have the capability to close the Strait though? I thought every naval asset they have has been flattened.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iran can close the straight with like 2 dudes with RPGs.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm picturing two Iranian guys, sitting in beach chairs next to the straight, sipping coctails, next to a crate marked "RPG".

[–] dcatt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

JustCause 3 loading screen vibes

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly the mental picture I had too.

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Plot twist, the crate is full of Monster Manuals and Dungeon Keepers Guides, and the guys were just hoping to have a fun afternoon.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Playing RPGs on their Steam Decks

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I had the same thought only with a truck full of drones behind them.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They'd be houthis from yemen (inshallah), not Iranians, but close enough

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trade ships will redirect at even the threat of being met with any confrontation. It is not worth the risk. Iran doesn't need a Navy to do this either. They need a couple dudes with AKs in a speedboat.

For more info. Just look at Yemen's blockade as an example.

Ships aren't gonna risk massive payloads. Insurance won't cover the loss either.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Don't even need to get near the ocean, they can just sit inland and launch drones and rockets at passing ships like the Houthis did.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep. Which is why I'm really confused by the reports of them "mining" it today. I'm really wondering if it's just a fake "win" the US is trying to manufacture.

Maybe they are trying to do it. But it doesn't make sense at all with their messages of allowing passage to states that boot US and Israeli ambassadors. Even if the mines can be deactivated it still doesn't make sense strategically for Iran to do that.

Was watching the reporting live with CBS saying that Iran was placing mines. Then Trump gets on and says we stopped them from doing it. Just doesn't add up at all.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Every major news outlet is complicit. Charlie's Broadcast Station is full Nazi now. I have have cut off all mainstream media for my sanity because it certainly isn't making more informed.

As for the mine claims, I think it's that Iran knows how our chickenshit post-industrialized vibe economy works. Just claiming they've mined the strait is causing the market to shit it's pants regardless of it it's true or not.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Interesting take on the mines I haven't thought about. Would make sense.

I agree. I do still try to follow how the mainstream media is trying to build its narrative. Though I would definitely be mentally healthy without it.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Considering it has signficantly affected oil prices. Yes.

A large amount of ships are currently stuck in the persian gulf. A significant portion of this is because they do not want to take the risk. The threat is enough to be effective but Iran is also enforcing it.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 1 month ago

Oil tankers tend to be a pretty risk-averse group. They're not going to risk getting hit and having their multi-million dollar cargo go up in flames, even if the risk of getting hit while transiting the strait is relatively low.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The Straits are 20 miles at the narrowest. they can hit ships with artillery. Plus they also have drones, which they've been using to hit over ten oil tankers since the illegal war began

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've been wondering the same thing.

It's a baller thing to say. But if they've lost air superiority (or even if it's compromised) then it doesn't mean much.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I read somewhere that Iran can close the strait without a full-scale naval engagement using selective drone strikes and harassing vessels, Iran triggers a spike in maritime insurance premiums which will choke shipping companies. Also because of the narrow width of the strait, also shallow, Iran can use mines, they have both simple contact mines to sophisticated "smart" mines, apparently they possesses one of the largest naval mine inventories in the world.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Those are fair points. They don't need to block all targeted traffic. They just have to be enough of a threat/pain in the ass for transportation and insurance rates to go up to an uncomfortable level. It's all about threat and perception.

Sure, the US air force and navy could bomb the shit out of their artillery placements. But given how (relatively) cheap and effective drones are, that might not be as effective as it seems at first.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How shallow? If a ship gets sunk would that be another obstacle?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Losing Air superiority doesn't mean their artillery stops working.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

All you have to do is scare the money people.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

They don’t need naval assets all they need to do is give the green light to Russian proxies who will lay mines and knock it out of action for years.