this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
630 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3432 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The biggest defense for this I see is:

  • it's not bad now
  • it's not mandatory
  • it will remain unused like the other fields that were previously there
  • you can put anything in it

Then, tell me, why bother adding this in the first place, exactly at the time governments are looking toward full control of everybody's computers? If it's that innocent and useless, either someone really likes throwing shit up, or it won't stop there.

And given the slate of other things that "didn't stop there" in the past few years, you know, it cost nothing to be cautious. Especially if it's "so useless you won't even notice it's there" after all.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

exactly at the time governments are looking toward full control

Isn't it all the time?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Then, tell me, why bother adding this in the first place, exactly at the time governments are looking toward full control of everybody’s computers? If it’s that innocent and useless, either someone really likes throwing shit up, or it won’t stop there.

It's there because systemd is the place that makes the most sense to store that kind of data.

Systemd stores user details.

This is a user detail.

So, storing it in systemd makes the most sense.

The alternative is having every individual program try to store data about the user in their own, non-interoperatble formats. That's a needless complication when systemd already stores user details

This field will not affect you unless you choose to let it. You get to pick what software is installed on your system. Unless you choose to use an application that validates your birthdate, the field does absolutely nothing.

For people who want to use birth date (say, maybe people with multiple kids) it makes way more sense to store that detail about the user along with every other detail about the user that's stored on the system.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The alternative is having every individual program try to store data about the user in their own, non-interoperatble formats

The alternative is NOT to store that data system wide, NOT have it made easily available to anything in the first place, and NOT normalizing having all your personal data available at will to everything.

Are you really arguing about the convenience of having personal data available system wide when it's is absolutely irrelevant to 99.9% of running applications?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You can choose to not install applications that use birthDate. It's your system.

But, you cannot choose what other people want to install. It's their system.

There are applications which exist, that other people can choose to install, that require this field and systemd is the logical place to store that information.

If you don't like the applications that would use this field, and you don't want your system to store information in birthDate then there is absolutely nothing stopping you from doing that. You don't get to make that choice for other people, however.