Things LLM can't do well without extensive checking on large corpus of data:
What is it they want to make "more efficient" again? Digesting thousands of documents, filter extremely specific subset of data, and shorten the output?
Oh.
That's the plan. Attack subject that are traditionally seen as taboo/sensitive/whatever, then extend. CSAM content, porn in general, even random bulletin board with cringey content these days, are used as the entrypoint. You target those, people are wary about defending their rights because of the flagship topic, so laws are changed to put some extra layers of tracking, surveillance, etc.
Step two is claim whatever site/service the current government dislike falls under an imaginary category that allows using these layers of surveillance. And these are extra hard to remove once put in place, because nobody wants to break their surveillance toy.
It's never about the porn, it's never about the kids, it's never about our security when a proposal shows up and talks about breaking encryption, privacy, etc.
Stuff we want: protecting kids, having privacy.
Stuff these proposal do: break privacy, don't care about kids (or anyone else for that matter).
Seems pretty simple to me. Again.
He would pay someone to do it for him, then claim he did it by itself, fumble doing it again on camera, an complain people are harassing poor baby musky and storm off.
Ah, you used logic. That's the issue. They don't do that.
I hope some people are keeping track of all this, to keep them ALL accountable, and put safeguards in place so that it won't happen again. I also hope there will be something to build on next US election.
If people are ok with authoritarian regimes, let's use that as an opportunity to strong hand transparency and trust into them. I was always against that stance, but the fucking shitfest we're seeing there? Yeah, no more of that. Force laws that prevents unlimited power when you can instead of hoping the next madman will play "fair".
The end result is the same though; if the bar is set to "be vaccinated against a minimal set of preventable disease", and either people are happy to not be, or worse, because there's always a worst option, we start seeing more cases of people falsely claiming to be vaccinated while they're not, other countries might start tightening the grip.
…how would we know that some vaccination certificates are bogus? I have no doubt that some people would be bright enough to travel while having measles or whatever. It already happened, and increasing the amount of people in this situation is unlikely to heighten their awareness of it :(
Weren't they saying good thing about vaccines a few week ago? After saying they were useless? After saying they were efficient? After saying they caused whatever? After saying they weren't against them? After saying they caused cognitive decline in kids? After saying they did not have an opinion? After saying they would not use them?
If a massive amount of people were not put in harms way by this senile sick idiot, it would be hilarious to make a montage of their interviews flip-flops.
There is nobody with more dedication than IP lawyers and Nintendo.
And where would you download from, that is seen as legal sharing of someone else's IP?
The closest you could get is by locating the ROM file in some PC remakes, assuming there's no "protection" on them.
Again, playing around the "legal" way to do things. In reality, it's different.
People buying the console for the games that are on that console, not generations before, are 100% fine.
Beside, it's not something you have to fiddle with to get it work. Either a patch come, or you're on your own.
They're also likely to fire the experts.