Privacy

5485 readers

19 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

Be civil and no prejudice
Don't promote big-tech software
No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
No reposting of news that was already posted
No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

otter@lemmy.ca

shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Will we have to choose between privacy-friendly Linux distros vs legal Linux distros? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by pglpm@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/62278765

Software changes for compliance with age-verification laws are being pushed a bit everywhere in Linux-development; for example:

In Systemd, already merged.

In xdg.desktop.portal (a portal frontend service for Flatpak and other desktop containment frameworks), still open.

In Arch Linux, still open.

In Freedesktop.org, still open.

It's interesting that it's the same small group of people behind these pull requests, and that discussion threads in them have been locked owing to a great amount of negative criticisms.

They say "we have to comply with the law". Which also means that if "the law" in the future will require proper verification, handling to 3rd-parties, or whatnot, then they will comply.

Well, it's their right to. They don't owe anything to anyone, and are under no obligation to report to users or to the community, nor to pay heed to anybody's wishes.

If things proceed in this direction, we users may at some point have to choose between privacy-friendly Linux distributions or legal Linux distributions. People who, like me, are worried, need to start thinking about concrete actions to take before it's too late: where to develop such distros? which channels to download and distribute them from? And so on. (And of course, more generally we need to write and protest to politicians, organize protest marches, go on strike, refuse to comply...)

It's good to remind to those who keep on repeating the words "legal" and "illegal" that for example Nelson Mandela was, technically speaking, a criminal who did and promoted illegal activity. This happens when laws become immoral.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The main problem is that people talking about systemd vs no-systemd again. Systemd is a framework, it's the distro team who chooses whether to enable this brainrot or not. It may be using systemd and not use that feature from it or it may be not using systemd and still cave in for this idiocy.