this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2274 readers
737 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, I agree, but outright prohibition is not the solution. Ban public smoking fine but outright prohibition is just more social control under the guise of "protecting" people just like how this age verification bullshit is "protecting the kids"

[–] inari@piefed.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let's see if works first, AFAIK this hasn't been attempted yet (New Zealand was about to but tobacco companies killed it)

[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah did they not do it in the end, I knew they were trying to but never heard any more about it so didn't know if it went through.

We will see, as you say the problem is tobacco companies have a lot of money, I just don't wish to see prohibition under the guise of public health, prohibition is always a tool of oppression and not in peoples interest. I'd rather see an outright ban in public places to actually benefit public health :)

[–] inari@piefed.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, is it? I'm happy to have stuff like asbestos prohibited. There's a bunch of harmful stuff that is banned all the time and it's a net positive in my opinion

[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Yeh that is fair, I concede that saying "always" is not accurate.