this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
434 points (98.7% liked)

World News

56472 readers
2383 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

How do you even protect yourself and your kids from this? Maybe I can mask up, but I can't expect my partner or her kids to do the same.

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Apparently quite a few people are developing ways to defect facial recognition https://www.stratecta.exchange/fashion-that-can-beat-facial-recognition-systems/
I was pleasantly surprised to find out Zenni now offers a near infrared blocking coating for their glasses.

[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

are the prices from Capable a joke? who thefuck pays $6-700 for a pair of joggers or sweater. privacy wear should be affordable, not a luxury. it’s the wealthy class that’s making this a problem in the first place

[–] CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Has Zenni gotten rid of the polarized lenses? I checked a few sunglasses and couldn't configure them with polarized lenses....

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought all but the cheapest sunglasses were polarized nowadays, but I could be wrong.

Unfortunately, none of the local eyewear companies sell polarised sunglasses. The only exception is bicycle glasses, but I have no wish to look like wicked pepe

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you’re wanting to block IR maybe look for a pair that uses the Zenni ID Guard thing? Edit: just double checked and that’s where the option is now.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How does this "anti-papparazi" thing work?

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Read the linked article. It goes through a lot methods.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I did read it but still can't grasp it.

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

reflective particles in the garment nullify flash photography by fucking with the exposure to wash out other elements of the subject

here's an example photo of Trevor Noah wearing one of these scarves without and with flash:

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So it only works with flash on. Not that helpful, then?

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yes but these are designed to deter a specific type of intrusion from paparazzi, hence their popularity with celebrities. if it was effective at all times, it would be blinding to the naked eye, which would limit its usefulness to most people.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If someone were to take a picture of me without flash, the scarf would lose their effect. I believe the glasses won't use flash.

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

if you're looking to evade passive facial detection by smart glasses, a facial covering like a surgical mask is probably the lowest profile solution, followed by those bulky IR-proof glasses like what Reflectacles sells. maybe a combination of both but at some point it becomes conspicuous to have your face covered so fully all the time, not to mention impractical for socialization.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Plus I also have to wear actual glasses, and I'd have to use either the IR glasses either my glasses.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago

I had no idea there were so many methods

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

There are already cameras everywhere. As you walk down the street you're probably on and average of 3 ring cameras at any time. Cars have cameras, stores have lots of cameras (the fake ones you see, and the real hidden ones). There have been pen cameras and tie clip cameras for decades. Glasses cameras aren't really a big step.