this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
633 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7504 readers
542 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
633
Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers (the-decoder.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by DiggyDiggyMole@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Link to the court ruling from the article (in German): https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/26_O_869_26_begl_Abschrift_Urteil_v_28_05_2026_Geschwarzt_Geschwarzt_Geschwarzt.pdf

Found the article on HN. The article itself is meh, but I couldn't find any other site reporting on it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

As it should. Google is factually responsible for the resulting slop and should be legally responsible for it.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

I hope for the one-two punch of:

  1. they're legally responsible for anything the slop machine says
  2. the slop is machine generated, so it isn't copyrightable

Also, we got a third benefit if this ruling too. Google said, on the record, that it shouldn't be responsible because you can't trust anything that the slop-generator generates. Having that on the record could also be useful in a lot of other lawsuits.