this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
745 points (98.8% liked)

memes

21698 readers
2726 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] udc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Does anyone know is there a reason why they got rid of dislike? I'd have thought they'd want it to help improve recommendations?

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

The main reason cited was that downvotes discouraged creators from naming and uploading content. There’s probably some truth to it. If I got served with a 10 minute tutorial video and a 60% vote ratio I’m probably not watching that very far.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If I recall correctly, they said it was to preview "review bombing" of small channel. They said that a few weeks after YouTube's own channel published one of the most disliked video ever (YouTube rewind).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-disliked_YouTube_videos

[–] logan_hero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

December 13th 2021(og dislike removal day) happened like 3 years after rewind 2018 dislike bombing

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

It's the children who are wrong.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want more money. Helping the user is only good if it makes money. Anyway, down votes give viewers more information, and probably YT wants to doctor the data in a way that downvotes block.

For example, I would always downvote AI content if allowed. So would countless others. But YT wants people to watch it, right? So they gotta suppress our negative feedback.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Youtube wants you to brainlessly watch whatever the algorithm spits at you next. Ideally, you'd have no information at all about the video before watching it. No title, no creator name, no view count, no thumbnail, nothing. Just CONSOOM. Attach their autoplay slop hose directly to your mouth and don't ask questions about what's flowing through it.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was routinely being gamed, made it kinda useless for semi popular stuff when you couldn't tell if something was actually garbage, or just had upset the wrong people.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

Honestly I'd rather have that now, a sizable minority of users hate AI videos.