this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
369 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30330 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Today, I’m proud to sign landmark legislation expanding on my administration’s work to make Illinois a safe, empowering, and inclusive place for the LGBTQ+ community,” Pritzker wrote on social media. “With my signature, we are a few steps closer to a state where all can live their lives without fear of hate.”

Pritzker then posted a video of himself touting the bills as he prepared to march in Chicago’s Pride Parade. “It’s very important to me that we have a state that stands up and protects the people who live here,” he said. “So I’m very happy, very proud, frankly, to live in the state of Illinois. I hope you are, too.”

Oh wow! The USA has been such a pit of despair about this recently (especially in the Midwest). It's really nice to see this beacon of hope amongst a hateful pit of a region.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If a bad person has the intelligence and foresight to consistently do a bunch of good things to gain our respect so that we vote for them, and continue to do those things while in power so that we continue to vote for them, why should we care if they are a bad person?

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pritzker was secretly about to cut taxes for a whole lot of data centers to be built, and got called out by the competition. Turns out his private equity firm was invested in several of those tech companies and stood to make a big profit off it all... Then all the sudden he makes this big public announcement that they're pausing these plans for data centers or whatever it was recently, to look like the good guy. He only backpedaled because he was caught.

The HUGE pica law (protect IL communities act) is a joke, banning a bunch of guns while his family owns a range just over the border in WI where you can legally shoot all those banned guns. Not to mention Pritzker Corp used to own a gun parts manufacturer. So, a little 2-faced and will call it an investment strategy im sure, but still.

Don't let the facade fool you, he's no better than the rest... He's just had not time in public light and knows how to schmooze people better. That's the whole thing his campaigns based on, "not Trump" and people will gobble it up unknowingly.

Edit: let me remind you everyone thought Elon was great and ambitious with Tesla, his Mars objectives, boring company, then Dogecoin (up until 2021ish)... All the while being not a great person but did stuff for positive spotlight. Now with a lot more influence, can get away with so much more than before.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Well, that shows the importance of scrutinising every action of all our public officials. He is clearly doing everything he can get away with.

However, the Elon comparison is a bit much. Let's compare him to a more representative billionaire like Bill Gates, who polished his rep for a little while with huge seemingly philanthropic actions, until getting caught being a massive creep and a much less generous philanthropist than people thought.