this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
220 points (97.4% liked)

politics

30374 readers
2297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This means he can be replaced with another Democrat

Per the NYT

Graham Platner can be replaced as the Democratic nominee for Senate in Maine if he withdraws from the race by next Monday, and state law would then give the state Democratic Party until July 27 to name a replacement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noahm@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

His replacement will have no chance. This whole campaign and all the controversy around it have been so poorly managed. The dems have shot themselves in the foot again. So now we get six more years of rapist-enabler Susan Collins. This is not an improvement.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That's the thing that gets me. The choice was someone accused of being "consensually careless" (suspeciously crafted phrasing), and a known rapist enabler who supports a man who is known to have been besties with Epstein of all people.

People fall for this shit because, like always, targeting the emotions of people during an election is a surefire and guaranteed way to manipulate it. Never fails.

And even if it were true (maybe it is but it's sus), the choice to me is clear (even if way way way less than ideal)

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you're underestimating how unpopular Republicans are right now. Not to say any generic Democrat is guaranteed to win, but it's not like everything is set in stone already considering so

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don’t know. Recent polls showed the Platner/Collins race as a statistical dead-heat (tied within the margin of error). Collins has massive amounts of money to spend, and significant support from outside of Maine. Platner was generating a lot of enthusiasm; there were many houses with Platner signs in their lawns that had never publicly displayed such support for a candidate before. I think a lot of those people are going to be pretty disillusioned by this entire experience, and it won’t take many former Platner supporters staying home to tip the scales for Collins.

We’ll see what happens…

(edit: some coverage of the poll I mentioned, obviously from before the latest Platner issues were published. centralmaine.com)

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Democrats: a Republican is fine so long as we don't give a seat to a filthy progressive.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

A... progressive nazi who worked for blackwater and rapes women?