this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
1042 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7870 readers
1753 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lime Bar @limebar@mastodon.social

I am a little shocked at the lack of solidarity I see between artists working in different mediums wrt genAI.

Musicians who would never use it to make music use it to make cover art

Graphic artists reach for it to make music over their videos

Writers use it to illustrate their articles

And, considering software development an art, many use it to create web sites or apps to host their art.

None of this is necessary. All of this is harmful to the other artists.

Collaborate ffs.

Stop it.

Aug 09, 2026, 12:17 AM

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Keilik@lemmy.world 127 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Could it be a symptom of everybody being broke af and not wanting to ask someone to work for exposure? Because a lot of artists are lucky enough to make enough money to cover their expenses for doing the art, let alone anything else.

I would love to see more collaborations and rejection of AI for everything but the tasks that are actually a decent use case (preliminary searches and compiling massive pools of data) and I think one of the best way to start is to just pay people a living wage.

[–] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (6 children)

With how bad AI art is, I kind of wish that artists would be ok letting their work stand on its own. Like does an album need a cover or an article graphics if it’s just the equivalent of visual static. It’s not really elevating the piece any, it’s just there to fill a void. Make it ok to have stand alone pieces again!

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah i mean ive seen some straight dogshit album covers for good music. Its not like the cover sells the thing anyways.

Royalty free music is pretty cheap to come by and coding isnt that difficult.

If you need a thing and cant pay for a thing, then learn to do the thing. A shit job is better than ai generated imho

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

coding isnt that difficult.

What programs have you written?

Bro stop, it's literally my career because it was the only thing that felt easy to me (I tried a bunch of stuff before), like it's a lot easier and cheaper to learn on your own than most crafts and imo it should be even easier. I don't take this as offense, I take it as a compliment that we are one of the few careers where people still have enough power over their tools to genuinely improve them and enough solidarity to put in the effort of making it more and more accessible to others, be it by making simpler tools, or writing tutorials and guides for free, or taking the time to answer even the noobiest questions. I want to see more and more comments like this.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Im a software developer by trade. Originally for a msp combining several companies' backups and Outlook info (locally hosted and 365) into a single SQL backed dashboard, now under an NDA.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I was triggered by that statement too and about to throw a rant, but I think they mean it like "creating a webpage", using stuff like wordpress and the like, because they're an artist who wants to show off their portfolio or something.

There's a lot of "DIY" that abstracts away the actual programming part, so others can just build what they need easily.

[–] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Seriously! I yearn for the old days of really crappy photoshop album covers! They’re at least an earnest expression of what the band is trying to convey

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You can literally take a photo on your phone and add some text in gimp. No one buys music for the cover art (I do acknowledge that good cover art adds something, but it's not usually make or break).

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've had CDs in the past that were just one color with the name of the artist/band and the album name. Nothing else. No one cared either because it would just be thrown into the CD zip up case or a cd holder attached to the sun vizer.

[–] Keilik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The existence of AI art is currently the most convincing proof I have ever seen of the existence of the human soul.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Exactly. The Beatles released an album with a blank white cover. It was brilliant. There's really no need to fill every space with slop.

[–] discoplasm@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

ehh. i sort of do use cover art as a filter tho, especially when i am looking for things like death metal or crust on bandcamp, a hand-drawn or collaged cover that looks very grotty and possibly by others' standards "not very good" is something i will click on and probably end up buying. i have found a lot of bands i like that way, generally if they are using that style of artwork they will be my jam. it's not pointless visual static to me, it's additional information about how the album will sound.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My dream is to be a published author. I would sooner release a book with no art than use genAI art.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Can also be that people react badly to AI in areas where they have some knowledge and taste, but are too ignorant to care in other areas. I'm a prolific reader and (imho) an ok writer, so I'm revolted by AI slop in written text. But I'm a moron when it comes to art, so I'm I haven't been too bothered by AI art per se. Of course that it comes from chewing up and spitting out human artists' work is revolting too, but that's separate and more distant.