this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
211 points (96.9% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3904 readers
12 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 4 days ago (3 children)

As a trans person I see this as a ‘do not travel’ map.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

red usually means danger zone. and its right to assume that.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Given how gerrymandering works its not adequate. Notice how there's no red in California on this map?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

That just means no county in CA got to 80%.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It really depends. Some of these areas that aren't literally out in the sticks or old sundown towns, they're just ignorant morons and not dangerous face to face.

Source: I've lived in several of these places for far more years than I'll ever care to contemplate and boy do I understand the social isolation trans people have to live with... These ignorant hicks are harmless in the literal sense, but they'll still give weird looks and cold shoulders to anything their tiny shriveled brains fail to understand. Which is a lot.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My hometown is one of these red areas, I haven't been back in almost a decade and I don't plan on returning any time soon. I disagree that they're harmless; hate crimes against queer people have only gone up in the past few years. It can happen anywhere, but it's way more likely to happen in one of these red areas.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Voting against the interests of yourself and everyone in your community can be dangerous.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social -1 points 3 days ago

Can be. Not dangerous enough, I'd say.