this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
73 points (98.7% liked)

TechTakes

2645 readers
110 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We are winning :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The more jobs lost to AI will accelerate that even more. It was never about making things easier for the worker. It has always been about not having to pay humans. Take from the bottom to feed the top.

[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't even think it will take many jobs permanently, but to your point it never mattered if AI works or can actually replace human beings at work, all that matters is that people believe it will and then that means that companies can fire large amounts of workers and hire them back under permanently "temporary" positions that pay less, have less stability and condescend the humanity of the worker at a basic level by framing their labor as a temporary substitution for a superior LLM/"AI" to eventually step in and replace.

It is the SAME EXACT STORY as how Uber from the beginning framed its human drivers as temporary... even as dreams of self driving cars have faded from any serious discussion in the near term.. the mistreatment, devaluing and dehumanization were successfully codified into the rideshare industry which was always the goal in the first place.

Which isn't to say that plenty of CEOs haven't drank the KoolAid on AI and are totally lost in the sauce, but two things can be true at the same time...

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Also, a job that llms CAN do well was a waste of time to begin with.