you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 month ago (21 children)

“We are not against the deployment of new technologies in a sensible manner, but we would oppose the use of AI if the primary motivation is to secure savings only,” said Simola. “Whatever the government decides on AI in the public sector transformation, the final implementation plan should not overlook what impact the changes will have on employees and on how public services are both managed and delivered to ensure quality and higher productivity.”

If AI can do the same job with equal quality, why would it be bad if the primary motivation is to secure savings only?

I'm not Finnish but as a citizen i would rather have my tax money spent on stuff that can't be automated then on stuff that can.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It isn't inconceivable that they have picked up on the "hype-wagon" that AI is being propelled with. Investors have poured a lot into the technology and consistently promote the technology while all other sectors of society have mixed feelings about it. Still I agree that I can't see why a financial incentive is being ruled out. Maybe it is based on the idea of putting people first, and not selfishly cutting jobs from society, then again, that would invalidate the idea in the first instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (20 replies)