this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
613 points (98.3% liked)

196

5893 readers
2068 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

People will be picky under any economic system, assuming they aren’t starving

The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

― John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath

[–] PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That really sucks but "highly edible" is a very funny phrase.

I am too, highly edible.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Exactly, nothing about capitalism is efficient and it never was. Capitalism is brutally effective at producing large quantities of stuff, but that doesn't mean the waste is mitigated at all. In fact, the waste correlates with production.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 67 points 3 days ago (6 children)

40% thrown away does not necessarily imply all others are better.

Normally imperfect produce goes to processing plants (juice, cans, pies etc.) but I'm not sure if there's any significant market for banana chunks/puree.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Our local popular brand of fish sticks has banana puree as an ingredient. It's not noticeable at all, at most it changes the texture of the batter a little.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

There's a difference between a market and a significant market.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago

There are some frozen fruit mixes that use banana chunks. Also some that use frozen puree in pre-measured shapes.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Banana juice is a thing, and banana chips and such. Probably too small of a market to repurpose all the uncool bananas :/

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 2 points 23 hours ago

Banana chips are usually made with cooking bananas, also known as plátano in south America. It's a different fruit, much less sweet, usually eaten after cooking and before the ripening is complete (plátano verde).

It's quite uncommon in Europe and NA, but it's a staple of the central and south American cuisine

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

They figured out ways to cram all the subsidized surplus soy and almonds nobody wants into every conceivable product, they could certainly manage to do so with ugly bananas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s really crazy how cheap bananas are. They’re flown in from tropical countries and are at least half the cost of local in season produce. And they’re throwing away so many at every stage of production.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bananas come by slow boat.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, slow Banana boat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 42 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Imagine if they actually sold the whole crop to stores. Bananas would be $0.10 a pound. You would never be hungry.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

See, you've found the issue they're trying to avoid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It wouldn't decrease prices quite as much as you'd think, since so much of the cost of a banana is transportation, which they don't do with the ones they throw out. They should still do it, obviously, and then transport them on trains to reduce transportation cost as well.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

iirc transport on ship is actually cheaper than trains i think due to not needing rails and also ships being fucking huge which means low surface area to volume ratio, so you need less steel to build them.

also how do you build a train line from south america to europe?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

Good old artificial scarcity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bad logic because evidently it is so efficient it can waste things on visual standards alone... Lemmy lemmy lemmy what will we do with you...

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'd be less of a problem if there was no cost to throwing edible food thrown away. That excess grown food decomposes and releases potent greenhouse gasses; an externality that the people deciding how much food to grow don't have to pay. The entire motive for not selling all your crops is to maximize profit, and profit has no regard for how it serves society.

It's all too often left out of the conversation, but part of the feedback loop for chasing profits are the opportunity costs when trying to attract investment capital. The capitalist class being able to freely invest wherever they want causes them to demand corner cutting, force exploitative practices, and encourage everyone to ignore externalities. Capitalism is not simply events and practices that can be viewed in isolation, but an interconnected system where bullshit in one industry does not stay in one industry. People not being able to grasp such a large and interconnected system is part of why it is so hard to oppose.

It's viscerally upsetting to view food being wasted when so many cannot afford to eat properly. Even though throwing away food it is not the direct reason for mass starvation, it is a cog in the machine that creates it. For that reason, people drawing the line between the two is not as irrational as you think.

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you see food on the other side of the world being wasted fret not because having it shipped to you would be dramatically worse. The meme doesn't make sense it's okay to call out things that are wrong doesn't say anything about me other than I am an asshole.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thankfully due to this show, at least Woolworths (Safeway) and maybe some other stores brought out a range of fruit and vegetables called "The Odd Bunch" that are cheaper and less "perfect". It's a small step, but at least it's a start.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My city (in Canada) mostly has Save-On-Foods that sells "Not-So-Perfect" frozen blueberries which are a couple dollars cheaper than normal frozen blueberries. Pretty sure Thrifties (Sobeys) sells the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Humans have produced enough food, and had the capability to feed every human in the world for over 500 years. Every famine you've seen in the news, all of them, has been caused by keeping food from being delivered to those that are hungry.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

had the capability to feed every human in the world for over 500 years

Not 500, more like 120 or so years. First thanks to the invention of refrigerated logistics (essential for transporting foodstuffs without them spoiling during the trip) and then thanks to the Haber-Bosch process of extracting nitrogen from the atmosphere, which is essential for industrial fertilizers.

Famines since ~1930 could've been avoided if the "waste" surplus was redirected

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

That's just historically untrue. 500 years ago we didn't have much of the technology needed for reliable harvest. Many farms were still highly dependant on rain. No rain, no crops. A late freeze, no crops. Locusts, no crops. You starve.That simple.

This doesn't include the absolute necessity of artificial fertizlier in maintaining the modern population.

Maybe your statement could be true if we had the ability to move crops from areas not expirencing a disaster that could have fixed it, but would have been very difficult and required a global effort. So technically humanity may have produced enough food, but there was not a real way to move it. Even ignoring profit incentives that control logistics and assuming a altruistic system of redistribution, it could take weeks for messages to arrive in areas that did have food. Then it would take weeks to move it. No refrigeration, the fastest you could move is horse.

Seems very unlikely

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'd assume that intercontinental food shipping would have been rather difficult in the 1500s.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The grapes of wrath was written 100.years ago. The fact that capitalism is still considered the only solution (other than the state sanctioned anarchists like Chomsky) is testament to the concept that the ideas of any society are the ideas of the ruling class.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] khendron@piefed.ca 17 points 2 days ago

My grocery store has a "imperfect produce" section, where they have funny shaped bananas, oranges that are not round, that sort of thing. Really cheap, and just as tasty.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are there actually people who think capitalism is efficient? Like sure it's not Soviet level beaurocracy inefficiency but I wouldn't stake my life saving medicine on this system if I had any other option

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Efficient at creating oligarchs and robber barons

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Capitalism is only efficient if it's highly regulated. See the Scandinavian countries being successful at controlling capitalism.

[–] derry@midwest.social 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all,” Steinbeck wrote. “Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground…a million people hungry, needing the fruit — and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains.”

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Finally read this book last week. Needs to be a required read for every human. Basically every sentence had me nodding furiously in agreement . really shows how fucking evil rich people are even back then when they had WAYYYYYYYYYYY less than they do now.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally separate from the capitalism part, isn't composting a portion of what is grown to return nutrients and maintain soil health a thing? Along with crop rotation, I thought composting the unwanted or unusable products either through a feed-to-manure or organic waste composting method was part of healthy arable land management.

The capitalism part is certainly creating a larger "unwanted/unusable" percentage, but is there any information on how it is impacting overall land sustainability? Monocropping is 100% known to be killing farmland, so I am wondering what the current state of agricultural research is around this.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Totally separate from the capitalism part, isn’t composting a portion of what is grown to return nutrients and maintain soil health a thing?

Probably not the wisest behavior when there's a fungal infection going around.

[–] Emi@ani.social 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Here lidl has boxes of random fruit and vegetables that don't meet the pretty standard for like 25czk now probably more. But now I see them rarely. They were great when I wanted to make soup or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›