this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1043 points (98.2% liked)

World News

45351 readers
4347 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oliver@lemmy.midgardmates.com 10 points 4 hours ago

Well, why should Agent Krasnov put tariffs on the hand that feeds him, good old Vlad? 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 17 points 7 hours ago

So US imposed tariff on penguins, but 0 on Russia!

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Guys I think there's some evidence that this is, shall we say, Russia friendly (such as the astronomical tariff rate on Moldova of all places), but Russia isn't included because it's a "Column 2" country alongside Belarus, Cuba, and North Korea, and therefore all subject to the stiff tariffs we already impose on the worst of the worst. Please let's not share things like this which just make us look gullable to the morons on the right supporting this buffoon. It's not a good look.

[–] Carol2852@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Do you have a source for this? I checked https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypxnnyg7jo but cannot find this.

Edit: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/17517599 says that some countries are not included in tariffs because they are sanctioned instead.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm sad now.

[–] Wolverdiddlyino@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Krasnov strikes again! Until there is evidence to counter this theory, it satisfies Occam's Razor.

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 15 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Should tell you everything you need to know.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 96 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That picture is one of the funniest I’ve ever seen. Absolutely a classic.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 73 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

You can view this one of two ways, possibly both:

  1. Krasnov
  2. Trump apparently was doing these tariffs based on trade deficits (Which is stupid on its own, if your dentist doesn't buy the widgets you sell, that's not a tariff.), if Russia wasn't running one, then there you go.

To rebuke 2 I present the following- https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/europe-middle-east/russia-and-eurasia/russia

U.S. total goods trade with Russia were an estimated $3.5 billion in 2024. U.S. goods exports to Russia in 2024 were $526.1 million, down 12.3 percent ($73.5 million) from 2023. U.S. goods imports from Russia totaled $3.0 billion in 2024, down 34.2 percent ($1.6 billion) from 2023. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a 37.5 percent decrease ($1.5 billion) over 2023.

Based on that math, with the CNN article I linked for the formula (the country’s trade deficit divided by its exports to the United States times 1/2) we get - (2,500,000,000 / 3,000,000,000) * 1/2 = 0.416666...

So Russia should have a 42% tariff based on their purported 83% tariff on us.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 18 points 12 hours ago

And that's how you end up in Guantanamo.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 12 hours ago

I was noticing this as well. The place that should have the highest tarrifs.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

For context, Cuba, North Korea, and Belarus are also not tariffed because they are sanctioned instead.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wondered the same thing. Why would you add tariffs if it's illegal to even trade with them?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

One wouldn't, which makes all the Krasnov comments in this situation entertaining.

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 94 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (17 children)

Uh? Of course he isn't. Why would Putin tell him to put tariffs on himself? That makes no sense.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 191 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Un-fucking-real.

This presidency will be such a shit stain on the world. The world will never trust the U.S. in the same way it did before.

Over a century of trust and partnerships destroyed in less than 100 days.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 42 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well. The bridge took some damage in the previous Trump admin as well.

I think far too many people forgot those times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] el_twitto@lemmy.world 266 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

Trump is definitely a Russian asset.

[–] feanpoli@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 hours ago

And Putin isn't a U.S. asset? While both countries are geopolitical adversaries, their military and strategic moves have ironically helped sustain each other's defense industries; just not in a cooperative way.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 31 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

I try to keep a sense of perspective, every president I disagree with seems to be the worst president ever at the time.

I really want to say Bush's useless Trillion dollar wars are worse than this.

But it's close and we have 3.5 more years of this.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›