this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
466 points (99.4% liked)

196

5924 readers
1404 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Gonna be real with you all.

I wouldn't be surprised if the cannibalism stuff is true to some extent but I'm not equipped to sit here and fact check this. I've not seen all the emails but that one email shared was rather sus, but who knows with these rich fucks. Anyways, please don't go full hog on something even if it's likely. I think we can all live with this information squirreled into the "maybe true but we have enough reason to want to dethrone the oligarchs already so let's hold off on saying that this is a fact until more info comes out" box.

[–] hectocotylus@sh.itjust.works 84 points 3 days ago

Both things ~~can be~~ are true.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yea it very much is both, it's kinda wild as fuck seeing op defend the honor of a child sex trafficker and his clients against allegations from children he trafficked

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

eating babies feels more epically evil and exploiting peoples labour.... feels more like a boring type of evil.

and i believe that peeps prefer epic evil ~ ~ ~

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Was a time I thought the epically evil would cause larger, more unanimous reactions from people, because it’s sensational and most everyone agrees on it being unacceptable.

But then someone went and won the 2026 U.S. election and I stopped being so naïve.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

wait whos going to win this year?

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

I mean… yeah. Boring crime is boring! Isn’t ’white collar’ crime less pursued? Who wants to hear about Joe manipulating spreadsheets to steal some money versus some person who went of a shooting spree? Or a high speed chase? Those are insanely dangerous but great tv!

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its because they hope one day they will be the rich exploiting labor.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

It’s cause they dream of exploiting other people’s labour but even though the average person is very selfish, they are very far from eating babies.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

People go out of their way to invent elaborate conspiracy theories when the real conspiracy is capitalism.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A model, Gabriela Rico Jimenez, was disappeared because she tried to bring attention to the rich eating people.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

According to Wikipedia:

The video contains no documented evidence supporting the claims made, and there are no publicly available legal proceedings known to have been connected to the statements in the footage.

Why were you convinced?

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because she was never seen again.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Could she have been crazy or lying or something like that and still have disappeared? I mean, people do disappear sometimes. The two things aren't necessarily related.

Like, if there was some guy who was always yelling about space aliens, and then one day he turns up missing, I'm not going to go "Ah, yes, the aliens must have finally gotten him!"

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

It's Mexico. She's dead. There's a good bit of cannibalism in the Epstein files too man, it's hard to accept but that's our reality.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you don't believe whistleblowers or victims or the literal content of his emails, and you're just denying it based on vibes?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You have whistleblowers and victims and emails...talking about cannibalism?

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And again, you heard it from one of Epstein's victims and made sure to try and debunk it. That's kinda gross as shit, why would you do that? Do you debunk every allegation you see towards rich and famous and powerful men?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are trying to hijack the victims' search for justice to promote your stupid fucking conspiracy theory. That is gross as shit.

Again, see the Wikipedia article. Nobody is prosecuting this because the evidence is not credible.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So you just didn't read the page, and still refuse to believe his victims? It's not a fucking conspiracy, it's literally right there.

Here's a wikipedia article of my own, does this mean Virginia Giuffre wasn't telling the truth?

The epstein class will not reward you for attacking the people they victimized and silenced. You're fucking disgusting, I hope you get exactly what trump gave at the island. Or is he also innocent bc nobody's prosecuting him?

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The first one is only a modest proposal

[–] ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure it's a dig at QAnon

[–] Bort@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

¿Por que no los dos?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

The second one was already settled like 200 years ago.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago

All the same if the end result is the guillotine.