this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
874 points (98.2% liked)

Buy European

10199 readers
530 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Europe has survived 3 energy shocks in 4 years. The only way out is to stop buying power from its enemies | Fortune

https://fortune.com/2026/03/25/europe-3-energy-shocks-in-4-years-what-to-do-next/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 143 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Nah, we'll just buy gas from US and postpone electrification of transport couple decades. What could go wrong?

Thank you! We just do not do enough fracking here yet.

[โ€“] kurcatovium@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

I would electrify my transport in a heartbeat, if only it wasn't so fucking expensive. Like ~30kโ‚ฌ for cheapest Kia BEV? Not even speaking about more "premium" brands. How tf should I get that with mediocre eastern european salary?

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] myrmidex@belgae.social 75 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Stop buying gas from the enemy after 4 years of war? Preposterous!

[โ€“] Denjin@feddit.uk 48 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The EU has reduced Russian gas imports from 45% of the total gas imports of the union before the invasion of Ukraine to 13% at the end of 2025 and will be at 0% by 2027.

Coal and oil are already at 0%.

It's not like you can just switch off 150bn cubic meters of gas overnight

[โ€“] nuko147@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that they replaced most of it with the 3 times more expensive USA's LNG.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Mihies@programming.dev 67 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Or, ya know, build on self-sustainable sources.

[โ€“] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

But nuclear is so bad!!1! Better burn coal and oil and "clean" gas!!

Renewables FTW, with a nuclear backdrop til we can phase out that too is the way forward IMO.

[โ€“] wewbull@feddit.uk 28 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

You know nuclear isn't self-sustainable? Uranium is mined in only a few places.

The volume of uranium used is so low that is feasible to store years of supply; this is not possible with gas.

But it should be noted as a risk, of course.

[โ€“] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Uranium-based nuclear power isnโ€™t ideal, but thorium-based nuclear power shows a lot of promise, because thorium is both way more common than uranium, and way harder to weaponize.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

And? You're trying to argue it's like oil?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 56 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The enemies of europe (and any other country) are billionares and politicians.

[โ€“] coredev@programming.dev 14 points 2 weeks ago

Politicans can be cool. Some are not. But you could be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (38 children)

And who would those be? Renewable energy independence is the only way.

load more comments (38 replies)
[โ€“] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly, don't buy from the usa, our once allie has shown open hostility.

[โ€“] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its pretty funny how little that narrows down your nationality

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Trump was driving trade diversification around the world with the idiotic tariffs, and now, with the illegal war against Iran, he's creating a resurgence of interest in renewables and EVs. Exact opposite of what he says he wants but maybe not so bad in the long run.

[โ€“] sunbytes@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a really positive outlook and I love it.

[โ€“] Bababasti@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

Except that a bunch of people on the other side of the planet are dying because of this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] makyo@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like it should have been clear to everyone since at least 9/11 and the aftermath but no one in leadership has made the obvious case that renewables are great for national security and not just the environment. Really shameful loss for humanity.

[โ€“] NABDad@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was of the opinion that after 9/11, if the USA was actually interested in security, we would have invested in alternative energy.

Instead we invested in death and oil. Like always.

[โ€“] encelado748@feddit.org 21 points 2 weeks ago

The technology is there. We need solar, wind, batteries, hydro-storage and nuclear, which is hold back by fear and costs driven by bureaucracy. What we lack is political capital and supranational coordination. We need to scale up production and learn from the Chinese. The demand for batteries is there.

[โ€“] Nangijala@feddit.dk 20 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

In Denmark, we have been investing heavily in solar panels and windmills the last few years, which is awesome! Electric car purchases have also exploded.

Now we just need to do away with out pig production and we will have more fields to place solar panels on and there will still be plenty of space to turn former pig feed fields into wildlife reserves so our nature can recover from the damage these pig farmers have done to our country. It'll take time, but I'm optimistic about our green policies in the future. We are heading in the right direction.

load more comments (17 replies)
[โ€“] Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
  1. More nuclear power plants
  2. more renevables
  3. more public transport and evs
load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So there's no need for subsidies money because the epic capitalism Invisible hand private market "just needs permission to go green"? This might be one of the dumbest "conclusions" to an article I've read in a while. I hope this entire thing was written by AI.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ