Mihies

What problems? (no problems since there is no monitoring, right)

My only problem with Fedora (Workstation) is that it really likes upgrade though restart. And upgrades are daily. It ~~can't~~ can be turned off (to not require restart) on KDE variant, but I didn't find an option on Gnome one.

I beg to differ, while I'm in the later camp. 200W help with almost no weight added seems like a good trad-off to me, specially with gravel bikes.

Even here in Slovenia universities don't have problems working with Israeli counterparts. One would expect at least some spine from academics, but I guess greed prevails.

Awesome results from sanctions. I wish EU would follow suit.

I mean the UK has 6% of its energy over the year come from solar, and 30% from wind, and installations are only accelerating, so this amount of installed solar is far from unrealistic.

Yep. No issues there. The core problem is storage here. And until we have a solid plan how to deliver with proven technology present today, we have to build new and run existing nuclear power plants. The other option is gambling.

Actually energy from fusion reactors on Earth does make a lot of sense. Sadly we are advancing slowly there.

That's why we have all that power available, right? You guys keeping listing various technologies but ~~it isn't~~ they aren't available nowhere at scale. Even this feature is not that common among the cars of today. And 10kWh is nowhere enough during winter (and perhaps summer with A/C), perhaps for single not big house with heat pump. Good luck with big cities.

EVs provides more than 24 hours of needed energy in an area

Only if it was fully charged, you don't drive with it and you live in a house. And thus are not a reliable energy source at all, even less for general energy problems.

H2 technologies are advancing, including storage and pipes.

~~All technology is~~ All technologies are advancing, but do you have a solution today? And even with advancements, you'll hardly solve H2 flammability. Even keeping it contained is problematic.

Yes, something like that. Now, while you can theoretically install that many solar panels, the kicker is that you don't have nowhere enough storage. And even if you had that 10%, you could increase solar all you want, but the nuclear would be still running at 90MW because of the storage, or better, the lack of it. And because you would have a surplus of cheap solar power energy during the day - assuming more solar panels than 10%, it would erode more expensive nuclear one to become even more expensive. Basically if we solve storage, we can get rid of nuclear, but not before.

You mean like Rutte? 🙃

I'm seeing that this is the case with all the reporters in the White House - when the Orange insults them like that, they are just silent. Including insulted ones. 🤷