Maybe if you saved it all in cash. But who does that?
If you invested the first $100k and earned a very modest 4%/year. After 2000 years you'd have $1,165,946,431,999,999,965,770,988,108,697,149,898,752
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
300 points (97.8% liked)
Risa
8150 readers
15 users here now
Star Trek memes and shitposts
Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This is my go to evidence that the whole beliefs that real estate values always increase is absurd.
If real estate prices always increase, even modestly, then an apartment in Rome or Paris would cost hundreds of trillions of dollars. Obviously that's not the case, and since land speculation isn't exactly a new thing, there is a correction somewhere.
it’s balanced out by the fake estate business
a true yin to its yang
On the flip side if you invested in the equivalent of the Roman SNP500 you'd indeed have a gazillion denariuses.
what's the euro to sesterce exchange rate these days?
This is an astute observation.
In fact, macroeconomic theory would say that appreciation in real estate should be tied to the rate of interest, which in turn should be tied the rise of the price level: inflation.
There are discrepancies, of course. Lately real estate has been growing faster than inflation. And importantly, during the Second Thirty Years War, 1914-1945, those European apartments suffered great depreciation and outright physical destruction.
The biggest thing that happened, though, is that inflation essentially did not exist until the second half of the nineteenth century. As far as we can tell, inflation was created by the industrial revolution. Before then, with wide error bars, you can tie prices from the 1760s to prices from the Roman Empire, in the same base metals.
For more evidence, read the works of Jane Austen and Victor Hugo. They are full of specific prices for things that make no sense to modern readers. But the authors expected that future readers would be able relate to the specific prices. Modern fiction authors avoid mentioning specific prices when they want their work to feel timeless.
Source, generally: Thomas Piketty. Capital in the Twenty First Century.
Huh when did a standard investment system like that start
He was more than a Q. He was a union man.
I thought his union didn't like him
Lol. And yet it was still difficult for them to fire him!
It even started a Civil War!
And that was fixed by a good shagging. Well not that good. And not really a shagging.
Eh, you get what I mean.
Jesus would open a whip braiding co-op if he heard that stat
That's not so long! Passover was just a week ago.... Oh... Oh jesus
we dont talk about jc here
What you mean? Pike is christian.
shhh
Yo I need money. But not money saved since Jesus..
But with all that money, why would you care whose ahead and behind you... And do they care about that, or is that just a narrative we've bought into, something to make us feel a certain way about the wealthy being unpleasant?
It's not a question of who's in front of or behind you. It's realizing that even if you received a ludicrous amount of money, repeatedly, over a ludicrous amount of time, it still wouldn't even scratch the utter lunacy that is the wealth of the ultra-rich. There is no way to earn that amount of wealth, in the sense of how you and I earn money. They acquired it by taking unjustly; there is no just way to become that wealthy.
No shit, I was using the royal "you" to wonder about the already wealthy. What goes on in their heads.
Legal thieves, and their kin.
Non-sense. Just be born rich, stupid.
This is how the vaat majority of wealthy people acquired the vast majority of their money. There was a study recently.