There's a contingent of threadiverse users who interpret "anti censorship" to mean "all speech should be permitted, even against other's consent" and view any stifling of that to be immoral.
My take is that if platforms permit the loudest voices to overwhelm others, you just have censorship of a different flavor. Piefed is taking an interesting approach to that problem and I think it's interesting to watch!
I remember this episode it is the one where riker just learned to make banana splits
I've watched this before, it's one of my favorites. Great selection of pieces and it flows really well. I would love to see something similar in person one day.
This is just more "if a company isn't growing faster than the S&P500 it's literally dying" logic.
I have no love for Zuck or Meta but if reality means anything then their stock price is still ridiculously inflated.
True actually it can get quite hectic 😅
The biggest problem with a censorship proof decentralized social media platform is that the instances without moderation inevitably attract the sorts of people that get banned from everywhere else.
Pardon my ignorance but isn't that exactly what Inoreader and Feedly do?
Surprised nobody recommended "Overcooked!" It has really fun bite-sized rounds with four player local coop.
EDIT: It's also $4 on Steam with right now: https://store.steampowered.com/app/448510/overcooked/
Test failed sorry
What a scoop! thank goodness for the hard hitting in-depth investigative journalism of uh... smart.. prix.
Sorry I need to backtrack for a moment. I don't understand how you're suggesting right-wing discussion need not be on the "Threadvisere as a whole"? How would that even be possible? It's an open platform, instances don't get to control other instances.
I think you're right but I also have to imagine the old. users are disproportionately contributing quality parts and replies to the niche communities that make reddit "sticky".
I'm ok if reddit keeps the users that want an endless feed of memes and low effort content.