This article has been removed due to being inaccurate.
this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
297 points (91.8% liked)
World News
56060 readers
1861 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
well i guess that means we should either remove it or get wasted in the comments on horse paste?
You're being hysterical, dear. Maybe it's that time of the month? I recommend Epsom salts and bromide. Sorry, I'll explain again to the head of the house.
Fine. Here’s my credit card. Now can you just relax?
This has been retracted
Fake News?!!!
IDK they corrected it and said the lady was confused for another passenger and it was miscommunication.
Sounds familiar.
"Bloody vomit and passing out with a 43° fever? Bitch your BMI is 33 what do you expect?"
If you'd actually read the article instead of jumping straight from the headline to the funny quip you thought of:
Why? Because what she was telling [them] was [that she had] an episode of coughing some days ago that had disappeared, and what she was having at that moment was kind of like stress or anxiety or nervousness. So it was not catalogued [as hantavirus],” [Spanish health minister] Padilla said.
This doesn't sound like a discrimination thing; she literally described a cough that went away days ago and an anxiety she was feeling.
So out of curiosity because I shit on MAGA for this all the time. This is a special interest story trying to make us feel a certain way isn't it? It's not about statistics or facts. It's about a feeling. It's manipulative.
What is that message the author wants us to feel
It's not even true. The article has been retracted because they mixed people up and it was a woman who tested negative that was told it was anxiety.
This is insane. What happened to journalism.
They just want you to click so they can get paid. It's called clickbait. It isn't a special interest story.
My question is, what does that say about us? What is the message the author knew would work on us?
This is by definition a special interest story. It might as well be a story about an elderly women feeding ducks by the pond.
doctors from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the Spanish foreign health service assessed the French woman and dismissed her symptoms as anxiety or stress
Somehow, this doesn't engender confidence in the ability of these entities to provide accurate assessments moving forward into what could potentially be a larger outbreak.
"That guy coughing up a lung look okay to you, Clef?"
"Mmm? Oh ... yeah. Just a little stress, I'd imagine. Have you seen the price of petrol lately?"
Statistically likely they would treat a man more seriously though. Women are far too often dismissed with anxiety or just dismissed altogether.
In the US perhaps, over here we are proud to dismiss anyone with anxiety regardless of gender, women in particular get instead dismissed with period cramps or potential pregnancies! /s
"We have the best dismissal rates. I know all about dismissing women. Nobody knows more about dismissing women than me. Women come up to me all the time, tears in their eyes. 'Mr President, you raped me when I was 13'. I just call them a bitch, and dismiss them. And when you're famous, you can do it! Believe me. Believe me".
(It's so hideous some of that was based on actual events).
It didn't actually happen. There was some confusion and their souce was talking about a different woman who didn't test positive. The Guardian has retracted the article
This wouldn't' be the first time medical misogyny was fatal.
When professional medicine was new, a doctor (male) was about three or four times more likely to kill a pregnant person or their infant than the midwife (female), who knew about washing her hands. The AMA was a pioneer in early American anti-abortion activism. Not for moral objection, just to discredit midwives and clever-women who dominated reproductive care at that time.
I agree with the medical misogyny part but the hand washing nurses part is incorrect AFAIK. They weren't washing their hands either but the doctors were working on cadavers and so more riddled with nasty bacteria.
Women giving birth in the street had higher survival rates than either of the two hospitals in question which is fucking wild.
Half arsed history does a really great episode on it. Episode 91. Highly recommended.
Even after Semmelweis forced everyone to wash their hands and proved how life saving it was, he got enormous pushback for the notion that doctors could be killing their patients. Arrogance costing lives.
I almost died of amoeba hystolytica in Bolivia 20 years ago because of medics saying bullshit like this: "You are just not used to our diet!"
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you!
Well, not that shocked