this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
931 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

12008 readers
2565 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 138 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

$70,000 is a lot more than the median individual income. You can probably afford to spend a bit on lunch if you're single and making that amount.

[–] mrmisses@fedinsfw.app 72 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah if he thinks 70k is poor... Woah buddy

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 24 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I'm not quite sure how to interpret this. Unless you're single in a low COL area, 70k in 2026 IS poor. Or, more accurately, it does not give someone everything that defined the post war "middle class" leaving you working poor or just old fashioned poor. The decision in the 90s to tell a technical-truth-lie about inflation to underreport it by 1-2% per year did wonders for juicing the economy, but now it's time to pay the piper so to speak. Median personal income in 2024 was $45k, but after 30 years (Rule of 70) of underreported inflation it should be almost twice that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I make if I am lucky 35k this year. Fucker if I made double that then I could afford this. But fuck that asshole. Billionaires should never tell us how to live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago

It depends where you live. 70k in a big city area barely covers rent on a studio apartment.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

First if you want to spend $28 on lunch do it just to spite big Kev.

I'm single and make about twice that figure and there is zero chance I would spend $28 on lunch let alone on any kind of recurring basis. People just need to do the little things that make them happy, if thats eating out do it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 80 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Stupid indeed.

Instead of paying $28 for lunch, they should just eat the rich.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago

when you toss 'em on the grill, watch out for flare-ups. lots of fat, not a lot of meat.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

When he was a junior asshole, that $28 meal would cost $9.

I personally think food inflation has rather exceeded the median rate so it’s probably even less than that; my lived experience says that in 2019 I could get a meal for $15-20 and now it’s $25-30, but the inflation calculator disagrees.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 weeks ago

When he was in his twenties, $5 would have been an indulgent lunch, and you'd probably still receive some change

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Avocado toast all over again. They do this to every generation.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yep, same script - "it's your fault and you should feel ashamed."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 65 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You got two watches on homie

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 2 weeks ago

And each of them probably costs well into the 6-figure range.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago

We're not poor because of what we spend, and they fucking know it.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Its $28 because you rich assholes ruin everything

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hands up who isn't making anywhere near 70k.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't for most of my life until I finally was and then I became disabled shortly thereafter, prompting the government to decide that I should live on sub-poverty wages which aren't enough to feed myself because it's easier and cheaper for them if I just die.

[–] ravelin@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

And whose fault is it that lunch costs $28????????

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 32 points 2 weeks ago

Detached from reality old dude strikes again. It's easy enough for a single meal at a fast food drive through to be $15 these days.

[–] Burray_Mookchin@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

It's insulting that this guy says 70k like it's a low salary (for "kids" as he says). I make a quarter of that. I also know a lot more retired old people who never made close to that in their lifetime than ones who did make that much

And if I did make that much it would still feel insulting because I'm pretty sure most people making 70k can easily afford weekly $28 lunches...

Edit: Just saw that this motherfucker is wearing two expensive watches on the photo... absolutely repulsive person

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's right, people should stop spending $28 on lunch and just eat the rich instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It's wild that these elites are shitting on people spending $27 on a meal...

It's not 2017, that doesn't buy you much of a meal.

The cheapest food in my town I can think of is still a solid $8-9. And that is for a very unappetizing sandwich. A small upgrade to a chain "Jersey Mike's Sub" puts you back $11.15 before tax - no drink, no chips.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (17 children)

Bruh, I wish I made $70,000/yr. It was what I went to college for after all only for the entire world to change after 4 years, now I can't afford myself and in debt.

Regardless, this is ignoring the fact that inflation has increased the cost of groceries in general, not just lunch. Even though Trump ran on it, apparently inflation never actually happened now that he's in office. The collective amnesia from the right when it benefits them is just infuriating

load more comments (17 replies)

Oh no! Another asshole billionaire who is out of touch with reality. Whatever will we do?

[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 24 points 2 weeks ago

Said the Person with two watches

[–] Takeshidude@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fuck, I wish I was making 70k a year how do I live in this fantasy world?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen this argument from people before, with avocado toast and Starbucks and everything else, but no one seems to ask why lunch is $28 or blame the people charging $28 for lunch as part of the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lets just fucking kill him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is he wearing 2 watches?

[–] mbp@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I went to Subway last night. You know, the 5-dollar footlong place.

A footlong sub was $12 (not the meal - just the sandwich).

McDonalds is charging 8 dollars for a breakfast muffin.

My rent has gone from 800 to 2000 since Covid.

I have to fill my tank 3 times a weeks, and right now that costs 50 bucks.

On top of that, I have to help my parents out because their pension didn't account for real-world inflation and their extremely comfy retirement turned out not to be nearly enough when the grocery bill doubled.

That 73k I make does less than the 30k I made back in 2016.

[–] Footer1998@crazypeople.online 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

now imagine you still make 30k and also most of your friends cant get jobs to begin with and still with parents in their mid 20s and also half of them are having mental breakdowns and thats the gen z experience

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Okay 🪄. Everyone who makes under 70k will never eat out again.

This eliminates more than half of the customer base of the restaurant industry, most of which promptly implodes. Millions lose their jobs. What's worse is that all that restaurant spending gets redirected towards grocery stores. Grocery stores move far more product with just a fraction of the workers and they will be damned before they hand out raises to share their new windfall profits. This drastically reduces the velocity of money in the economy and drags us into a sudden contraction.

The storefronts those restaurants occupied, the ones that used to be central meeting points for their communities, become urban blight. Those workers, too, stop being able to pay rent or buy much of anything else, which deals a collateral blow to residential real estate and every business that makes consumer goods. The collapse of the restaurant industry and the sudden blow to landlords of all varieties takes a large tax base with it, and state and local governments that rely on sales and property tax see an immediate budgetary shortfall.

These so-called titans of industry cannot see, will never see, that the "wasteful" and "unthrifty" spending they hate is utterly vital. Their distaste for the poors experiencing such luxuries as participating in simple consumption blinds them to the fact that that spending is the economy.


ETA: Instead of the rest of us tightening our belts even more, the wealthy need to spend a lot more. Fund a literacy program, hand a million dollars to a small electric car conversion company, drop a cool 10 million on urban infill, fuck, build a pyramid. Anything is better than sitting on your wealth doing nothing but chasing rent-seeking enterprises like stock buybacks and cloud infra.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait is $70,000 a year a low amount of money? That's an insane amount of money to be considered poor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

People that can impulse buy outragiously expensive watches and cars shouldn't be lecturing the plebs on what to splurge on.

Especially not food. Food is one of last big joys of life for the commoners. Any splurge here is entirely valid.

These people need to stop getting platformed. If you're in such a position, please just enjoy your privilege in silence and leave us the fuck alone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

we should eat him for lunch and see what that costs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Last time I went to a food truck by my office a very basic lunch was $22. And that was before the machine assumed you should tip 18%.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Last week I had some $15 curry to celebrate getting a new job. I think that's the most expensive meal I've had all year

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From about a year ago. Huh, me thinks he has been to his island and/or ranch:

“If any of you cared about the victims, you wouldn’t drag these women who are in childbearing years now, some of them now having children, back into the limelight, back into the same story, to expose them again to this hideous outcome,” O’Leary said Tuesday. “These guys, they don’t want you to help them anymore.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-shark-tank-star-kevin-oleary-sparks-fury-with-claim-about-childbearing-epstein-victims/

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago

What an odd and weird thing for him to say about childbearing and what the victims want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i want to jam his face into a waffle iron

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's giving $10 banana vibes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes, that famously cheap commodity of food, that has not jumped in price at all.

I mean good thing bread is cheap and there was no price fixing. I mean someone making $70,000 (above average) a year should not even think of eating more then gruel (not that that is cheap anymore) let alone at a restaurant. Not like the whole system is based on spending money, I am sure a business insider article will fix that though.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's because people like him exist that we are poor.

Him and his generation took everything and talking high and mighty just because they had first dibs on everything before we got a chance to have any kind of decent life.

Nothing he says should be taken seriously and he should be another example of why the rich need to be removed from existence.

load more comments
view more: next ›