this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

Palestine

1621 readers
113 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are clear laws on enforcing blockades – Israel’s interception of the Madleen raises serious questions (The Conversation, 2025-06-10)

https://theconversation.com/there-are-clear-laws-on-enforcing-blockades-israels-interception-of-the-madleen-raises-serious-questions-258562
———

>> International law also strongly protects the freedom of navigation, particularly in international waters ...

>> There are only a few exceptions when a country can lawfully stop a foreign ship in international waters ...

>> international humanitarian law, … protects civilians during conflict. This protection extends to people delivering humanitarian aid, so long as they do not directly take part in hostilities.

>> Bringing aid to civilians, even if politically controversial, does not meet this legal threshold [to be considered directly participating in hostilities]. As a result, the #Madleen’s passengers remain protected civilians and should not be treated as combatants or detained arbitrarily…

#FreedomFlotilla #BreakTheSiege
@palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@a.gup.pe @israel

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adachika192@hcommons.social 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

(cont.) There are clear laws on enforcing blockades – Israel’s interception of the #Madleen raises serious questions (The Conversation, 2025-06-10)

https://theconversation.com/there-are-clear-laws-on-enforcing-blockades-israels-interception-of-the-madleen-raises-serious-questions-258562
———

>> Naval blockades are not automatically illegal. … a blockade may be used in wartime, but only if five legal conditions are met:

• it must be formally declared and publicly notified
• it must be effectively enforced in practice
• it must be applied impartially to all ships
• it must not block access to neutral ports or coastlines
• it must not stop the delivery of humanitarian aid to civilians.

>> If even one of these conditions is not met, the blockade may be considered illegal under customary international humanitarian law.

#BreakTheSiege #FreedomFlotilla

@palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@a.gup.pe @israel

[–] godofbiscuits@sfba.social 1 points 4 days ago

@adachika192 @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@a.gup.pe @israel

Israel being anything but lawless at this point…

@adachika192 @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@a.gup.pe @israel

seems odd that the article talks about how you can and can't enforce blockades, without underlining that this blockade itself is illegal, since it forms an element of Israel's illegal occupation of Gaza, as confirmed in the ICJ advisory opinion.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1932044486701437399?refresh=1749473920

4. Un État ne peut intercepter un navire étranger en Haute mer que dans des cas exceptionnels : 🏴‍☠️ Piraterie. 🧪Trafic illicite. 🏴 Navire sans pavillon. ❌ Blocus licite, proportionné, et respectueux du Droit international. 👉 Aucune de ces conditions n’est remplie ici. 5. Dans ce cas, 🇮🇱 invoque le blocus de Gaza. Mais c’est illegal car : ❌Gaza est un territoire occupé illegalement. ❌Ce blocus est un élément d’une politique criminelle visant à entraver l’aide humanitaire. Ce n’est pas moi qui le dit, c’est la justice internationale! ⚖️ 6.🔹 Gaza est un territoire occupé illégalement. ✔️ @CIJ_ICJ , avis de 2004 & 2024 : malgré le retrait de 2005, Israël exerce un contrôle effectif et donc une occupation prolongée & illégale. ➡️ Le blocus fait partie intégrante de cette occupation illégale.