this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
400 points (99.3% liked)

News

38014 readers
1618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Wouldn't it be neat of a ton of really rich assholes, suddenly woke up poor?

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well this poor bastard (me) will be waiting for the RAM, SSDs, and hard drives to come back down in price.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They won't. Corporations will never shed profits like that. They figure, regarding the jacked up price, that 'people have shown what they're willing to pay'.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's always an optimal point between demand and price. Ignoring part of your customer base is a risky strategy. The gap will almost certainly be filled by competitors, such as the upcoming Chinese semiconductor industry.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

The Chinese manufacturers will be happy to claim that gap in the market, and in a few years after they get established and ramp production they'll start undercutting everyone on those high margin data center products they abandoned consumers to focus on.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as someone is regulating companies, competition should, in theory, reduce prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webhead@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Except consumer demand is way way way down. The prices won't go back to what they were but they're going to have to drop considerably if the corporate money dries up. No one is buying it and they still need to sell it. Part of the reason things are so bad is they don't want to build more capacity and get fucked by a huge drop in demand like has happened before where RAM prices bottomed out to the point they lost money on the RAM they were selling.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Yes, but they’ll socialize the losses.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh no, I was a billionaire now I'm slumming it with 700 million....

More common: I am 65 years old and my retirement just imploded.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago

That's not gonna happen though. The rich will stay richer and the common pleb will be the ones carrying the weight of their failure.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If only this only impacted them.

The flow on effects of a major market crash are never isolated to just the stupid assholes building the bubble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ratrace@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pop already I can't wait to see the cryptoturds and the prompturds cry

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'd agree, except it'll ripple out to innocent regular people as well, just like the 2008 Great Recession, if not worse.

When regular people lose a lot of money, the richest get richer or are largely unaffected.

When the super rich lose enough money to actually hurt them, their interconnectedness with and control of everything that regular people need to survive means that millions if not billions of people will suffer immensely, up to and including dying because of it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Anyone thinking this means the technology will disappear will be sorely disappointed.

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago

Agreed, but maybe we can hope it won't be crammed down our throats quite so hard as investors stop demanding such big returns?

A girl can dream, anyway...

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 14 points 1 week ago

Of course not. Tech bro's don't understand consent.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah it won't go away but my job will mostly go back to normal. Right now they force us to use AI for everything even the stuff it sucks at. Even if I can do a better job manually they force me to use it. It's insane.

I want to use it to help me with the stuff I suck at and let me do the stuff I am good at. I can't wait for that to start. That's how I have used it in my personal life and it's been actually helpful. Not life changing though just helpful

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It will collapse on its own overinflated expectations anyway. Its not the clean easy replacement for humans that CEOs are pretending it is.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But can it replace CEOs?

Please?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is it selfish to think the collapse of the economy and potential loss of employment is worth it for component prices to drop back to normal?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

We always want the billionaires to get fucked because they caused this. But they'll game the system when it fails, too. You can't rely on collapse alone to bring a better world.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean... both are inevitable... the economy has collapsed for the normal people, and employments been hitting everyone for over a year, and bottom line, either way AI goes... it's a lot of jobs. IE it fails and shrinks down... all the jobs around it are in trouble, it actually succeeds it's going to take as many jobs as possible, there's no job friendly ending to this.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm too burnt out to care about the economy or component prices anymore.

I just want the morons who got hooked on this shit and ruined their brains into mush using it to reap what they have sowed and face the music when their brain substitute costs more than they could ever afford.

They thougt they could game the system by saturating everything with metric cartloads of useless slop, the bastards, while those of us with still functioning brains waddled through it and attempted to fix it!? Well, fuck them, now they won't be able to afford their crutch and their brain will be too far rotten to ever come back!

We'll still have to clean their damn mess, of course, and the world will be much worse than before they and their suppliers ruined it, but at least there might finally be a light at the end of the tunnel.

load more comments (1 replies)

I don't think so. I sometimes think of covid and how when actual calamity hits we suddenly realize money is a kind of fiction. If the economy goes totally to shit we will see no mass starvation and probably not even mass homelessness or else we would have to admit what a giant failure capitalism is.

Just like covid, at the end of the day when shit hits the fan we retreat back to that archaic and ancient system known as "socialism".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Get ready for GFC #2.

This one will be a lot worse than the sub-prime mortgage crisis, as AI investment has left many major banks, index funds, and most of the top 10 most valuable companies in the world heavily exposed, and the world governments are already at historic levels of debt - meaning a bail-out even if desired by those in power, may not be possible as it was in 2008.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Also there is more than 1 bubble that's pretty much fully inflated right now: for example, Realestate.

Further, household debt has never been this high and is well beyond 2007.

Then on top if this there's the record government debts in some countries (most notably, the US) and the weakening of trust in the USD thanks to a certain Mr D. Trump which might result in it losing its Reserve Currency status much faster, an event which would be massive, especially for the US Economy (it could very well trigger Hyperinflation).

When the AI bubble blows it will at the very least cause other bubbles to blow.

IMHO, this shit is going to be something of a level of the 2000 crash AND the 2008 Crash put together, possibly worse (especially in the US).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Let's see how many governments will end up with a D rating. The USA are probably a given but this might set a lot of major companies on fire so who knows who else will run out of money.

Of course China is laughing all the way to the bank. Their economy isn't super healthy right now but they aren't reliant on semiconductor companies that chained themselves to the AI racket. So they might weather the crash mostly unharmed and we'll all end up buying Loongson in the future because all of the x64 and ARM companies have folded.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It won't disappear, but the business will drastically change, and the knock-on effects will be serious.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It will be like the dot com bubble in many ways. Back in the late 1990’s every other TV commercial was for Pets.com, Ask Jeeves regularly had a balloon in the Macys Thanksgiving parade, and Lycos was pushing to be the home page for everybody. They never recovered after the bubble burst, and companies like Google quickly took over.

In a similar vein I think a lot of the AI big hitters will vanish once this bubble bursts, leaving one or two lucky/cautious ones still around to scavenge the pieces. But I don’t think companies will be so hung ho about using AI for everything once that happens.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

the internet was so exciting and interesting back then.

Compared to now where its just another corporate ruined hellscape that you cant even begin to get into without protection.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I could see generalist LLMs IE ChatGPT disappearing if only because they seem pretty fucken useless on average.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't think they will. I'm the first to be massively sceptical of LLMs, but that doesn't mean they can't be used to build good tools. The key is recognising that tasks where correctness is vital should not be solved by the LLM directly. At my job, we've built an LLM-agent that's very useful (internal use). What we've done is build essentially a Python library that this LLM uses to interact with our data. That way, we ensure that a query like "set up a skeleton for X" will be done correctly, while we save a bunch of time that would have otherwise been spent doing boilerplate work.

Basically: Enforce correctness by constraining how the LLM can interact with your data, and use the LLM to translate short natural-language queries into actions that otherwise would have taken 30 min of click-ops or write-run-toss scripting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Still time to inflate more. This season is still building up to the biggest and baddest. At the start of this season we hear names like Mythos and Glasswing but they don’t mean anything. Now we’ve learned they’re a new and faster way to discover vulnerabilities in software. The foreshadowing is building. We have the date, we know the upcoming catastrophe. In July, they will make public thousands of new software vulnerabilities. The internet will panic, software companies will spend billions on ai service to handle the damage. Anthropic will have a record IPO, followed by other AI companies. It’ll be YUGE. Stay tuned for the cliff hanger

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Will it stop the invasion of data centers?

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

It should, no money to pay for the people building them does tend to make them not get built

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

I better hurry up and buy an appropriate motherboard to buy discounted RAM and CPU after the pop. Figuring on a Gigabyte TRX50 AI TOP. Dunno what the difference is between that and the 2B version. This MB is interesting, you can go regular Threadripper or the PRO, depending on what suits your wallet.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

Come on one more pump baby

load more comments
view more: next ›