this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
6 points (75.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39947 readers
1041 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's imagine that AI will become cheaper and more efficient, it will not differ from humans in terms of the quality of its work, it will replace almost all intellectual workers, and only the operators of these AI models will have jobs, that is, one person or several people monitor the entire office of AI workers for a small salary. Yes, the AI bubble will burst, but the problems of ordinary people will only get worse from this, jobs will not return, no, automation will continue anyway.

Is it worth retraining as a mechanic, plumber or something like that?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 minutes ago

I'm in tech but I've got a manual trade I could fall back on. Unless robotics takes that from me too.

To be honest I think our only option will be to disengage from the economy. Governments won't have the coin for UBI or much else cos all of it is flowing up to the billionaires and I doubt there are many that properly pay tax.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

By letting all the copper thieves know where they can find a shitton of copper.

[–] TraderCR@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Don’t fall for the propaganda, AI can not execute real world technical tasks at a level that is acceptable. It is good for code, creative thinking or literary but tasks which require experience, real life human interactions, it is just not ready yet.

it is lagging 10-15 years of application development and even then it is only going to be able to compete with traditional execution.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If that worries you that much, yes. Retrain as an electrician, plumber or dressmaker.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I wouldn't bet that physical robotics will lag behind for long if AI does get to the point where it takes most knowledge jobs. Automating software development has turned out to be both easier and more profitable than automating plumbing, but that doesn't mean no one is ever going to automate plumbing. So as a software developer, I'm earning and investing money while I still can, and I'm doing the things on my bucket list in case we get the worst-case scenario. I think that in the long term, the outcome in which I still need money but have no way of earning it is less likely than either the "good end" or the "bad end" in which no one needs money anymore, so sometimes I feel silly saving up money I think I will probably never spend, but better safer than sorrier.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Your worst-case-scenario framing makes the question redundant.

You’re essentially asking: ‘Let’s imagine that something really bad is going to happen. Is it worth preparing for it?’

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 hour ago

"Are you living in the real world?"

"Do you have a comrade?"

"Do you have a plan?"

Me: Homer Simpson eating a meal on the couch talking to his Television: "I told you last night, no!"