this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
429 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9305 readers
262 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The FBI is chock full of Mormons. Why would they help dismantle a child sexual exploitation ring when the church they grew up in is founded on the exact same principles?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Holy shit it is? Maybe the Reckless Ben Lego war is going to go even deeper then..

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My buddy said her friend has a whole bit about Mormons, something like they’re the most connected so you really can’t get anything done unless the Mormons are in on it. Revolution, reform, legislation, organization, all gotta be done with the Mormons.

I was kinda like ha that’s funny. Then I watched all those Lego videos. I am now Mormon by proxy. Let’s do this shit

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If she replaced the word Mormons with Jews this suddenly reads a lot differently

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean not to be rude but that is an entirely different sentence and entirely different religion

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an entirely different religion but the sentence doesn't change that much.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I don’t agree, it would be an entirely different position than what I said. It changes the meaning. If I say white people suck and you say well change white people to black people it’d be an entirely different sentence that I did not say. If I said Islam instead of Mormonism it would have been a different point and that’s why I didn’t say Jews I said fucking Mormons. Don’t put that in my mouth

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Antisemitism is the ~~socialism~~ anti-Mormonism of fools.

It was always a psyop to distract people from Mormon infiltration

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. Always has been too. It’s also not just the FBI; federal law enforcement is disproportionately populated by members of LDS.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Don't drink, don't smoke, what do you do?

Subtle innuendos follow...

You should join the F B I

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the mossad is full of jews, why would they-

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Very obviously because he was working with the American and Israeli governments. You are ruled by billionaire pedophile cannibals, and you don't really care enough to do anything about it.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, no, if we just keep talking about the Epstein files they'll release them in their own for some reason! There's no need to get violent, that doesn't solve anything! Ignore the fact that our country was founded through violent revolution, and has a constitution specifically amended to allow another with the understanding that it would be necessary one day!

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

This guy gets it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So there is a list.
We were told there was no list. We all knew it was a lie.
But this is proof.

[–] Stowaway@midwest.social 28 points 1 week ago

Whoah now, get your facts straight. We were told there was a list. We were told it was on a desk ready for review. Then we were told it never existed.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Edit: https://me.mashable.com/culture/68056/epstein-files-shocking-2009-footage-shows-jeffreys-butler-trying-to-sell-black-book-of-victims-to-fb

'Authorities later arrested Rodriguez for failing to surrender the book as evidence. He reportedly described the document as his “insurance policy,” claiming he feared Epstein might make him “disappear.” Eventually, Rodriguez pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and served 18 months in prison.

Rodriguez died in 2014 from mesothelioma, a cancer commonly linked to asbestos exposure. His death was ruled natural.'

So what is the follow up on this, what happened to the butler? That information could get him charged for child porn and locked away and tortured for life by other inmates. Seems like something the FBI would do to protect Israel's blackmail operation.

How did this get released? Any articles about it?

[–] Athena5898@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why would the FBI care? They are part of it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Reading the guesswork here and the reporting (and lack thereof) on it, there aren't too many options.

The material was used as kompromat - IOW, if they prosecute the rich and the rich then spill the beans on everyone else in this despicable circle of money and power. Everyone who took bribes or other compensation, people skimming off the top one way or another, got jobs because of the favor of the rich, and of course sex and drugs I’m sure.

Everyone shuts up because everyone is guilty.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ils that Guy still alive?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

sell the client & victim

I guess he didn't get his "sexual exploitation of children for profit" license from the FBI.

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

In addition: We have the power. The US power grid is fragile. As such if we all turn off our power at the exact same time, we can cripple the grid. On July 4th at 11pm cst exactly, we can all power down our homes. Even if only 50% do it, it will enough. We have the power, and we will stop these monsters by any means necessary!

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why are people upvoting this, it makes zero sense. Turning off your home power accomplishes absolutely nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How does turning off the power cripple the grid?

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

More importantly, what's the point of crippling the grid...

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure thing. I can explain: copied from another reply: If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you had me on the first half not gonna lie

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I will admit, it's like talking about two different things but look at my replies to others and it'll make abit more sense. I'll try to find a more eloquent way to show how it's connected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The US power grid is fragile. As such if we all turn off our power at the exact same time, we can cripple the grid. On July 4th at 11pm cst exactly, we can all power down our homes. Even if only 50% do it, it will enough.

Please explain.

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sure thing. If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This guy has seen Jurassic Park.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

thanks Obama

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah I think I remember the trueanon podcast going over this in an early episode years ago, like 2021 or smth. Every time I hear a supposed bombshell about the case it's something they already covered years ago.

All the information needed to convict anyone has been available forever. There's just no will to convict among those with political power and no power in the hands of those that want to convict.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Just when you think it really can't get any worse...

load more comments
view more: next ›