"during good Behavior"
We have the right to remove blatantly corrupt Supreme Court Justices. If the system was functional, this would've happened as soon as the "free luxury vacations" and blatant preconcieved decisions came to light.
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
227 points (99.1% liked)
politics
30208 readers
2287 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I used to believe that we needed to add 4 seats to SCOTUS, but I no longer believe that. Now I believe that we should expand SCOTUS to 29 seats.
No bad faith president should be able to rig the court and affect policy for next 50 years. Having a 29 seat court, with rolling term limits, allows every President to appoint a few seats, but not enough to change the overall composition and direction of the court. It would allow America to stay on a steady path into the future, making it difficult for our society to take wild swings in policy and culture.
Our allies, and those we make treaties with, will appreciate it as well. They shouldn't have to worry that every four years, all their work and negotiations were for nothing.
We also need a citizens vote of no conference as a means of defense against corruption in every branch of state and federal government.
Yeah we should have a no confidence vote regularly. Maybe every 2 years for Congress and every 4 for the President
It’s very telling when Don chomo’s admin says things like “we’ll go to the scotus to get the outcome we want.”
That is blatantly implying their rulings are based on nothing more than what they want the verdict to be.
I love this idea.