this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
392 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

86219 readers
3122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 162 points 1 week ago (12 children)

AI has had like 14 Chernobyl moments. Wasn't the US using AI to bomb Iran? That include a whole school of girls IIRC. And guess what? No one cares.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

While I agree with you, the vast majority of users are still AI pilled.

Those users are what they are scared of loosing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chernobyl spread significant radiation over 8 million people with effects lasting for decades / generations. It spread detectable radiation across most of the globe.

I truly feel for the tragedy of the schoolgirls, but as Stalin said: one death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. Chernobyl was a statistic level event, so many individual tragedies that people can't feel them anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 125 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

All of these articles are for ai companies. Ooh, look at our scary powerful ai's. We're defenitly super close to agi. Please giv e us more money.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chernobyl blew up because they were dicking around with an unsafe design.

This analogue is very apt.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

An unsafe design that wasnt even fully tested.

Still bang on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about they stop building the torment nexus?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This take is a denial of current reality.

They're already using "AI" for genocide in Palestine, etc.

This is how capitalism always develops and uses "technology".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Delusional take. We, the people pretty much hate AI already. We hate how it‘s utilized against us.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People weren't wildly supportive of nuclear power before Chernobyl / TMI either, but after? 40 years of virtual moratorium on new construction in most of the world, absolute rollback in Germany. We've continued to poision ourselves with coal and wreck the climate with CO2 instead of learning to do nuclear right. If building of new plants weren't so difficult, older and less stable plants like Fukushima could have been decomissioned before having major problems.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except in this case, we're turning down the advancement of a technology that hurts humanity in every conceivable way and poisons the environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (43 children)

Wait, so its not the actual event and ensuing casualties that have AI researchers spooked, but the fact that it might cause the public to turn against AI?

[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Sir, our model has caused several explosions around the globe resulting in hundreds of thousands dead and people rioting against us."

"No! MY PROFIT!"

(I wish I could add an /s.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] nevyn@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are these "top ai researchers" real people?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

These top AI researchers are just investment bankers. So no, not real people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This "AI is inevitable" mindset is the most rapey shit ever.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI vibecoded nuclear plant. What could go wrong? You just need to add "no nuclear meltdown" at the end of the prompt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I’ll worry about ‘AI’ when something that can legitimately be mistaken as intelligence is demonstrated.

In the meantime, these explosively imprecise, statistically luke-warm, grey goo extrusion sphincters need to be exclusively opt-in, and not forced on anyone who hasn’t explicitly consented to a lobotomy.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Issue is, they're already trying to use it for things it shouldn't be used for...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DoomBananas@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Top AI researcher" I can no longer read those words without Doofy voice 😂

Probability of unhinged techbro bs is around 115%

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're always going on about how dangerous their AI is.

"Our hey our AI found 3,000 0-day security vulnerabilities in top software, we're only giving it to top software companies so that they can patch their products before we release"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing about Chernobyl was that it was, ultimately, an unwanted mistake.

The thing about AI is that the shitty mass casualty outcome seems like the intended outcome.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chernobyl: A massive catastrophic accident during testing and shift changes.

AI: A massive catastrophic accident intentionally caused by corporate greed and capitalism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Was double-tapping a school not enough?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Top AI researchers should go fuck themselves right to hell for handwaving away and ignoring the inherent problems with their work while plowing ahead full steam so they can get personally rich.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That implies an actual AI when the truth is in current form human error using the tool behind it.

Personally I am more concerned by it will be used by design of the techbros who are pretty open in their desire to be rid of some of the masses. Supporting emerging wars just masks their part….for now.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I don't think it needs to be an actual AI to cause a "Chernobyl Moment" maybe almost literally.

We have tech bros and random clueless idiots trying to shoehorn these glorified chat bots into basically everything, and an administration that doesn't seem interested in putting meaningful guardrails on the technology. What happens when it gets put in charge of something it really shouldn't and starts to hallucinate?

If it somehow ends up in charge of critical safety systems in a nuclear plant? (Remember that some of these tech bros want to have their own plants to power their data centers)

Or air traffic control and causes multiple crashes? (Pretty sure I've already seen that idea being floated)

Maybe every cybertruck goes haywire stuck on self-driving mode and they cause tons of damages and deaths for a few hours until their batteries run out.

Maybe it gets used to route navigation in Google maps and it ends up causing massive gridlock in every major city around the world for a day or two

Perhaps it gets used for identifying vehicles on traffic cameras and automatically issuing citations, but ends up citing everyone on the highway for a week whether or not they actually did anything plus a bunch of cars that it hallucinated before someone catches on. Millions of tickets are issued and need to be sorted out, if anyone actually pays the fines refunds need to be issued, some people maybe get their license revoked and maybe even get arrested because of it and all of that needs to be set straight

If any of these kinds of things happen on a big enough scale, I think that could be a Chernobyl Moment for AI

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a probability machine, not actual intelligence. If it’s given too much power it’s bound to happen sooner or later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’ll happen when they turn over some piece of critical infrastructure or something over to AI. Power, stock market, something that will affect tens or hundreds of millions of people and wreck lives or even kill people.

Nonetheless these clowns will push for it because profit, and some fool politicians will OK it because campaign money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

No worries, it seems companies are very eager to make this happen sooner than later 👍

[–] fogetaboutit@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (8 children)

There is a key difference, that makes the genie impossible to bottle: People can run local AI on their own machines. Fans of nuclear power can't easily build nuclear plants in their backyard. A pity, the world could use more nuclear energy. 😔

Anyhow, I am looking forward to someday using frontier-grade AI on my PC. Just need the AI bubble to pop, so that I can afford the terrabytes of memory that would be needed to comfortably run it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sounds like what Alex Karp is saying to retail investors. A lot more people got killed by AI than by Chernobyl by the way.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Only a matter of time. We don't need to worry about Terminator and Skynet. We need worry about everything going from engineered to automated cargo cult slop. All run on massive datacenters controlled by a few mega corporation that everyone is hopelessly dependent on and can't imagine working without. The trillionaire owners of these mega corporations are hiding in bunkers waiting on one of coming calamities to happen, or just from us unwashed masses. While they buy governments and media to keep and increases their riches.

This future sucks. Can I try another one?

Edit: slopocalypse is the term

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 11 points 1 week ago

"turns the world against AI forever"?? It already has, you don't have to be a "researcher" to come to that conclusion.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The majority of the world is already against AI. These jackasses need to pull their head out of their ass and come up for air.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It could already be happening. The likelihood could even be higher than not.

It doesn't necessarily need to be a single event. There are already AI systems being sold in healthcare. Even pre-LLMs. Who's to say these system are being closely monitored and studied. There could statistically be patients who have died or been maimed who otherwise wouldn't if they had real human professionals instead of someone who used a system that was sold on the doctors office.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Already used in ukraine war, palestenian genocide rtc. See autonomous drones.

We should already be against AI but mainstream media and class consciousness are suppressed to serve our billionaire overlords

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›