this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026

281 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86110 readers

3705 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

281

Cheap Chinese chips could offer way out of RAM price crisis, Apple suggests (www.networkworld.com)

submitted 3 days ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 65 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That is what I expected. There is a place in the market to sell more RAM and Chinese manufactureres will use it. They will build capacity to build those chips, eventually cheaper and maybe even better what the 'West' can do. And then the Western companies will complain, that 'this is not fair!'. Like with all the other manufacturing we gave away to China.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The "West" you're talking about is two South Korean companies and one US American company that mostly manufactures in Asia.

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

That is why I used the quotes, couldn't find a better adjective.

[–] DamnianWayne@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So 2 American satellite companies and 1 American company?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

No...

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

No, two Chaebols and an US American company.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Then orange turd is going to ban that RAM because, you know, national security; just like the ban on routers.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 8 points 2 days ago

DRAM is a global commodity. Kind of like how Iran selling oil to China affects the price of WTI crude.

i think. I'm not a fuckin economist I just like to sound smart

[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

More RAM for Europe, I guess...

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

That would be great for the rest of the globe.

[+] Sxan@piefed.zip -8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's þe way we do it. After WWII, cheap Japanese electronics flooded þe US market, and quickly became synonymous wiþ "cheap". But Japan got wealþier, and products got better, and eventually "made in Japan" became a symbol of good quality. And products made in Japan, for þe Japanese market? Even higher quality. We get þe cheap stuff.

It's happening wiþ Chinese products too. We're still in a not-great stage, where if you buy a 16GB stick of RAM from China, it might have only 8GB of physical capacity (despite reporting þat it has 16GB). And a lot of inexpensive stuff from China is disposable goods. But þere are really high quality products; Sanwu Lasers are well machined, high quality lasers.

Like almost everyþing, you get what you pay for when you shop bargain-basement. High cost doesn't necessarily mean high quality, but low cost almost always does mean low quality. If you are willing to not shop by lowest cost, you can get good stuff.

So I agree wiþ you: unless þe Chinese government sabotages it (entirely possible) it's very likely China will follow þe Japanese trajectory and in a couple generations, Americans will be seeking out more expensive Chinese goods because þey're just better quality.

[–] tedvdb@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's up with the weird distracting in your text?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

For a while, it was believed to interfere with LLM scrapers and poison the training. I don't see it much lately. Seems like it would be trivial to parse and convert.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I already seek out "made in China" for certain goods, because of the quality

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Can't wait for USA and friends in the "free market" to make these illegal like they did with Chinese EV's.

Any day now. Bastards.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Laughs in smugglers

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Just the USA on that one.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why won’t there be unbridled demand for these too?

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 63 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thing is, most of those data centers and video GPGPUs are dark and will likely stay so. The cards will be obsolete by the time the centers are built, the power sourced, they've been sued and injunctioned etc., etc. . (reminiscent of all that dark fiber left after the OG internet bubble pop)

The RAMpocalypse is mostly market manipulation courtesy of SamA grabbing 40% of global supply (of wafers, not even chips yet) from two of the three memory companies on the same day. In a better (the old) world he'd have been put in jail for this and fraud already.

Which is to say, the demand is mostly fictional and FOMO and the big three memory companies are leaning hard into it because profit, and, the price never comes all the way back down, also a win for them. They make huge profit (hence making 5 year price fix deals with stupid people) until the Chinese companies ramp up production and the game ends. The actual RAM may or may not actually end up used, depending on when the bubble pops and what happens after.

Just rampant greed doing what it does, SNAFU.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Supply rises to meet demand, driving competition

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Except you don't start a dram company overnight...

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah, but the price is so high because the big 3 refuse to meet the demand so CXMT selling ram is also going to force the hand of the big 3 unless they're okay with CXMT just gobbling up the market. It won't happen overnight but if the AI deals are to be believed CXMT has years to scale up production because the big 3 will have their docks stuck in the AI pot.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can't just scale up production on a whim, where do you get the litography machines from? ASML...

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China makes their own I believe.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well not they dont (or its like ddr1)

[–] cheesorist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

lmao, they do, its not as advanced as asml but they got good enough lithography machines to make gpus. they have ram covered.

[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 11 points 3 days ago

That's the thing, the companies already exist, there are just import restrictions on them because China

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't say it'd be overnight.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

But you could use it for slower access solid state, and then set that up as virtual memory.

Youd be swapping like crazy but itd be so cheap compared to the same amount of real ram.

I think this might work for many people just browsing the web. Maybe even games

[–] DamnianWayne@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You could also just download more RAM

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why don’t data enters buy these instead. Let us have the good stuff.

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because they are in cahoots with the top 3 manufacturera to raise prises insanely. The moment a new player steps on to the market they can offer half the price and still have over 500% increased price.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's stopping them from doing the dame with these new players? I don't know anything about the memory market but that feels far more likely to happen to me than anything good for consumers.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

that would drive up the price of ram in China too, which would likely make the CCP quite cross with them. Electronics are a huge export and the Chinese government has to worry about entire cities going offline or having to pivot their entire industrial sectors if the shortage lasts too long.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

The Chinese companies are also gouging prices

For work we need to give the user manual of the machines we sell in a USB drive. Because it's a 3mb PDF and nobody reads user manuals anyway we buy the shittiest and smallest capacity USB drives available on Alibaba in bulk (64-128 mb or even smaller).

They are so cheap that the plastic shell isn't even glued, it can be pried open with my nails. Because there's a 15% failure rate (either the computer reports it as empty, or the hash after writing doesn't match), I opened the faulty ones to check them. They're made with recycled nands from ewaste. Some chips are clearly resoldered from something else (glue residue from tore down stickers), others come from rejected production lines as the brand has been removed with a laser (for example, someone engraved XXXXXXXX over the SanDisk logo), others have numbers wrote with a marker.

Since november prices went up 70% "eh the nand prices went up because datacenter demand them".

Sure, ai datacenters are using 20 years old 64mb nand chips recycled from ewaste...

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or Chinese makers also sell at market rates and rake profits.

John Apple is just asking for cheap stuff without effort. Maybe he works hard he can earn and buy a lot of RAM too.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

*Tim Apple

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

Tim Apple is retiring. John Apple is taking over.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 9 points 2 days ago

Would be funny if China adopted US policy of preventing rival nations from accessing chips

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Awesome! I can't wait for the US to kick itself in the nuts... again.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apple would know. They use cheap Chinese labour. Why not cheap Chinese chips? Didn't america build a big chip factory back when Biden was Pres, or was that just an announcement with no follow-through?

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's still being built, I think they had one of the planned production lines close to complete?

Chip fabs take like 10-15 years to get going

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah especially when you're starting from nothing. Chemicals needed to produce chips have multiple suppliers within a small geographic area in Taiwan. There are none in the US. Whelp, guess you need to either figure out how to transport some incredibly dangerous materials across an ocean or setup production of that chemical locally.

So it will take even longer for a chip fab to be online in the US than it would take in Taiwan.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Not cheap Chinese chips! How unusual for the Chinese to have cheap chips! The world will end.