this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

529 readers
6 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Liberals giving it all they can.

Despite my better efforts, I got on Reddit today. I got into an argument with someone over their perceived lack of professionalism on the part of Noem.

Her lack of professionalism. Her lack of motherfucking professionalism.

That's all that liberal voter has issue with. Was her lack of professionalism over the whole thing.

I had to wrap my arms around my head to keep it from fucking exploding. It's so hard not to be a misanthrope sometimes. jfc.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Her lack of professionalism.

That's a take I didn't see at Bluesky. They are pissed. But - of course - they live in a different reality. There's a lib guy at Bluesky called Law Dork. I'm not making that up. He calls himself that. Today, he posted about the California National Guard and an order involving Trump. And he posted an image of a legal filing that - of course - I didn't read. Non-lawyers won't read that shit even if it's txt. So I asked him...

Trump will ignore the order. Then what?

And he blocked me. I actually laughed when I realized that. He could have just muted me. But he was a Law Dick. I can never see any of his threads at all. I guess he thinks the law is so special and so rarified that small brains (non-lawyers) need to stay out of his threads. But all he needed to do was provide a link to a news article that - of course - is written for non-lawyers. It's extra effort but he wants people to pay to read his Substack. Being helpful might get more paying readers. Instead he wants to be an elitist lib asshole.

Libs will say "We need to be united to fight Trump". But then have an attitude like Law Dick. For them it's "My way or the highway."

---

Edit

Appeals court temporarily blocks federal judge's ruling to return control of National Guard to California.

The majority of judges are Trump appointees. Shocker! Who couldda seen that comin'?

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

I like to put words into their mouths. But I can't beat that!

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I mean, I read this as Romabooposting until the stormtrooper part.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

hexbear posters 🤝 libs

calling the USA "the empire"

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Man these guys got annoying since their inception