this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

Buy European

10607 readers
178 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] dieTasse@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

People getting click-baited. The reality is that ALL small wearables are exempted as is also stated in the article. This title is such a trash...

Apple Watch and other wearables gain exemption from EU battery rules

and

That includes smartwatches, smart glasses, fitness trackers, and other small wearable devices.

My opinion is it should not be exempted. Fairbuds and Pebble watch are proof that you can have swappable battery in small devices.

[โ€“] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My wife and I both have a smart watch, both are about 1.5 year old and both have batteries that are starting to fail.

Replacing batteries innamart watches would not only be possible, it would be sensible. Then again, the world we currently live in makes no goddamn sense whatsoever, so at least that squares

[โ€“] dieTasse@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago

yeah, sadly we are living in disposable world...

[โ€“] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

The only exception I've seen, based on a genuine engineering challenge: IP68 and higher ratings. If the device isn't explicitly rated for water and dust proofing such that it requires specialized tools to disassemble, it should be user replaceable

Not on my watch!!

(As in I don't own one)

[โ€“] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's no reason for this other than corruption.

Whatever reason Apple gives is bullshit. They can very much design a watch that allows the user to easily replace the battery.

[โ€“] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Just for your information, the article notes this was a change pushed by U.S. officials in the context of the Meta glasses (the ones with always-on cameras), and that is applies to all sorts of wearable electronics (including the Meta glasses).

Of course, it is also in Apple's benefit to charge users a ridiculous amount of money for repairs, as it is for other big tech giants who produce wearables. No doubt all of them are colluding with the U.S. government, in exchange for money and likely personal data too

[โ€“] ipp0@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

โ€By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the following products incorporating portable batteries may be designed in such a way as to make the battery removable and replaceable only by independent professionals:
(a) appliances specifically designed to operate primarily in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion, and that are intended to be washable or rinseable;โ€

How is a wristwatch not designed for an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water? I wash my hands several times a day.

[โ€“] erebion@news.erebion.eu 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know how you do it, but I do wash my hands without getting my watch wet. Which is good, as not all watches are waterproof. And mine isn't. :D

Anyway, watches can be waterproof and have replaceable batteries. Like most watches, especially those that are not smartwatches.

[โ€“] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well no that's their point, the batteries can only be replaceable by an independant professional and not the user, because it's subject to frequent splashing water, therefore there's a waterproofing argument & the battery can't be user-serviceable

I'm not sure why they couldn't make a user-replaceable waterproof battery but there you go

[โ€“] 8uurg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think making the battery itself waterproof is necessarily the solution here though: you would need to make the battery user replaceable without sacrificing the waterproofing of the entire device.

There are ways of accomplishing this in devices though: action cameras generally have replaceable batteries with an extra waterproofing gasket for the battery tray. Those are even designed for frequent-ish swaps (though, outside of water).

[โ€“] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah so making it harder for new companies to develop a product while exempting the biggest offenders. Great.

[โ€“] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 9 points 4 days ago

It shouldn't be any more difficult than it was when smartphones first appeared and had them - they worked just fine. It was about squeezing customers by forcing them to upgrade when the batteries wore out.

[โ€“] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The law that exempts every device that it would apply to....

[โ€“] Kjell@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It does not exempts new devices from small companies, making it more difficult to compete with the tech giants.

[โ€“] oyzmo@piefed.social 20 points 4 days ago

What! Change battery on a watch!! No, that's not possible...

[โ€“] GreatDane@feddit.dk 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No special treatment for any company!

Gosh I hate the stranglehold corporate entities have over regulation. Example 3736281928372829177181833271537491613142

[โ€“] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 4 days ago

I love the smell of regulatory capture in the morning