this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
329 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

86983 readers
4361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 107 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Because of course. Who could have seen that coming before they added it

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (4 children)

What on Earth was every the intended use of this feature? I just can't think of any way to use it other than vandalism and misinformation.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I'm guessing that either a few devs thought it could be a cool toy and never gave a second thought about the ramifications (I can remotely understand that) or a bunch of managers who just dont give a shit thought they could monetize it

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 21 points 4 days ago

It's intended use was misinformation but perhaps not in the way you imagine.

Rather than producing credible images, these sorts of projects undermine actual credible images.

For example, if you're team zion, then when shown images of how devastating Israel's attack on Gaza has been you can just disregard them as "probably fake".

"Oh pish posh, a child can create these images on google maps".

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would've asked it to turn my city into a Warhammer 40k battlefield.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So Detroit?

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Google wanted its satellite images to help unleash users’ imaginations, like visualizing what an empty lot could look like, or seeing what their neighborhood looked like 100 years ago, or what it could look like 100 years from now.

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I remember doing something similar for a highschool History class -- learning about local rivers, riparian corridors, the ancient California valley lake, and our soil types (why and are what they are). All things to draw up a more accurate picture. No way Google would utilize any of that knowledge. If I was a kid today, with that tool.. definitely F- homework for sure.

All imagination, no accuracy.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

All ~~imagination~~ random guess work, no accuracy.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I don't necessarily buy their press release as their actual designed use case.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Oh I'm certain it's still there for their use.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I wonder what's stopping someone from just making a screen grab of a Google Maps satellite view and feeding it to one of the many AI image generators.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't even understand what this AI feature was even supposed to be for. I'm certainly not going to rely on an AI to annotate satellite imagery. This was always just a stupid marketing thing with no real purpose behind it.

For all of Google's faults, which of course are numerous, they do have some really talented engineers working for them, and it's just a shame that their time is constantly wasted on crap like this rather than on useful features that people would actually benefit from.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s to further the assault on truth.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

This is the answer.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It will be used to hide more zorro ranches and islands. It will also show areas that look nice, but will be leveled like Gaza

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

This is old news; backlash was immediate and the "feature" was rescinded.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Google is run ~~my~~ by assholes and idiots. Break it apart.

Edit: fixed silly typo

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Google runs your asshole and you want it broken apart? That's pretty wild dude

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 20 points 4 days ago

It might have been that plan all along, but now you can't tell someone to just google it. You can't believe google results anymore.

[–] khanh@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

wow...! people is using a feature that allows you to modify the appearance of a location anywhere on earth to add craters to places!! truly an unforseeable tragedy.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Those are balls.

This close, they always look like landscape. But nope, you're looking at balls.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Are those balls? 'Cause the last time we were here, they were balls.

[–] antiphon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I mean, it does seem fun. I don't want to turn it off. But maybe insert a hash into the image that makes it clear it's fake

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Eh, this one's fixable, because you only have a few sources of legit imagery, and it's all contemporary and digital. Just have Google Earth render the image server-side and add a cryptographic signature to any legit satellite images that someone saves.

You can have AI-generated satellite imagery and image-is-proof satellite images coexisting. Can't do that for most images, but for this particular niche, you can.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 3 points 4 days ago

Nobody is gonna do all that.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Nano banana!