this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
282 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

87124 readers
3750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I wish DDG defaulted to their no ai search.

If they want to make silly little jokes about “the other guys and their ai” then maybe don’t use ai shit as your default search option on your own platform?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"2. Only tech related news or articles."

[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

While the headline doesn't discuss it, the article begins with "Meta has opened Pandora’s box with its AI-infused smart sunglasses. The pricy accessory has sparked a heated debate over privacy, with unsavory individuals abusing the eyewear’s easily-missed cameras to harass unsuspecting strangers in public — garnering the specs the distinctly unflattering nickname of “pervert glasses.”"

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Zero AI, Cameras, or Even Electronics Whatsoever". but i conceded that manufacturing a lens and a frame qualifies as technology as far as i'm concerned

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You have the reading comprehension of a toddler. The article is not about a pair of glasses, it’s about a tech company’s response to AI and surveillance, and how another company is irresponsibly using those things.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

you actually look like a toddler

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How are glasses not technology?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

how did you miss my post saying they are?

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is that post within this same thread? I genuinely cannot see it, sometimes boost hides some comments for some reason. My bad.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

yes. and "technology" doesn't even have the same definition for everyone, so don't make too much of this thread, I'm just playing.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

...but does it have electrolytes?

[–] justabaldguy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Brawdo's got what plants crave.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Unperverted Glasses

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

Glasses without electronics? Then how will I see!?!

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 0 points 6 days ago

This is so stupid. Ddg thinks their users are dumb as fuck. I’m sure they’re right.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sooooo not anti-pervert and a generic publicity stunt. Haha please laugh etc. Don't have anything against DDG but can only roll my eyes at something like this

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Right. Anti-pervert glasses would at least require some lasers to meet the requisite qualifications.

[–] T3CHT@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

Fair - it's marketing.
But it's good marketing - lambasts a stupid thing that people dislike to promote a product that is selling the opposite (privacy).
Good goal, and the marketing is clearly working here we are talking about it.

Also DDG browser is awesome on mobile and Windows. Blocks many ads and trackers, even on YT. Lightweight, wicked fast, offers not only private search but private AI chat.

Use DDG Because Gemini is SUPER creepy when it inserts personal info in unrelated questions. It keeps inserting my family details in answering unrelated questions now... Like a perv.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 37 points 1 week ago

I mean, I'm not gonna buy them, but I still enjoy the dad joke.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Sometimes corny is fun

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have only read the title but this just seems like.. Normal glasses then?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. Just normal, AliBaba sunglasses.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Probably more expensive than AliBaba. Which might or might not mean better quality.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twisted@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So it’s not anti-pervert then. It’s just non-pervert.

Anti-pervert would be something like sunglasses that zap the pervert sunglasses' cameras with lasers and damage the sensor. Maybe they don’t have to be so accurate.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are infrared reflecting glasses that blind cameras.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Does this work for flock cameras?

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

Not sure. I assume they have a better IR filter than the small cameras used for the pervert glasses.

Although they may be IR sensitive because they also need to work at night though. Would need to see the technical specs.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe a sort of anti pervert mesh network where gamma radiation is fired in the direction of whoever wears pervert glasses and eventually kills them with cancer.

It’s incredibly irresponsible and would have unintended consequences for otherwise innocent people but it would technically work so capitalism says ship it before China does!

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The real move would be to include polarized lenses or a holographic coating to block infrared facial ID cameras like Flock. Because most sunglasses don’t block the infrared spectrum, meaning something like a Flock camera can see right through them.

These are basically just a dad joke, based on the fact that meta has made every other pair of sunglasses “anti-pervert sunglasses” by default.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, well said. I wish someone would sell and manufacture actual anti surveillance glasses

[–] gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Are these what you are looking for?

https://www.reflectacles.com/

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago

“No camera, no microphone, no AI, no battery, no electronics of any kind,” Knockaround boasts on its website. “Just a beautifully crafted pair of matte black sunglasses with a glossy DuckDuckGo logo, designed to block the sun and never send data to the cloud

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

$39 is probably still a huge markup.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

They're barely making back the research costs of producing sunglasses without a lithium-polymer battery or a 12 megapixel CMOS camera.

THE ABOVE COMMENT IS SARCASM.
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there's no extra markup involved here for what is essentially a marketing thing.

they're $35. which is also the price the 'normal' (not 'collab' edition) ones sell for direct on ka's web site or at retailers like rei.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, I recently got new prescription glasses (after wearing my previous pairs for way too long, BTW) and got some that have an IR-blocking coating that's supposed to block face recognition cameras. Because that apparently needs to be a thing these days.

(I'm disappointed that these DuckDuckGo glasses don't have a similar special coating. I like the company I got mine from, but I'd like to see more companies offering privacy-enhancing tech.)

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What, no company names to help out a fella?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I didn't want to give the appearance of shilling. But if you want to know, it's https://www.zennioptical.com/id-guard

There are apparently also similar products from "Reflectacles" and "Vaydr," but they were more expensive and/or not normal prescription glasses. The Zenni thing is just an extra coating you can add on to the glasses you would have otherwise bought anyway (which is how I found out about it; I didn't know it existed beforehand).

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks! It’s wild that this is a thing now. It’s like we’re living in a cyberpunk dystopia!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Is this now not not not the onion?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 1 week ago
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ironically actual meta

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sold out and I can't seem to pre-order a pair for their next batch (maybe the next allotment is already sold out).

Oh well, my wallet wins this round.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›