this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
278 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

2689 readers
175 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So enamored with the idea of replacing pesky humanses--forming unions, demanding time off, complaining about working conditions, getting hurt--they jumped in feet-first without testing it.

Idiots.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 23 hours ago

Hateful idiots who demand to try their plan to dehumanize people they have power over and then only reluctantly recognize their humanity condescendingly and temporarily when it fails.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

They don't call it Fix Or Repair Daily for nothing

[–] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Found on rez dump

[–] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Fucker only runs downhill.

[–] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Fuck, our ride died!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago

Might as well call American Workers Found On Road Dead too.

[–] RandomStranger@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's very telling about the "quality" of American industry. They wouldn't even run a pilot to figure out if the new tools work before they fire the staff? What kind of morons run these companies?

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

They think "move fast and break things" is an intelligent mantra. An aspirational goal.

In other words, they are stupid assholes.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 23 hours ago

The kind of people who understoood the point of AI and automation was never about it working but rather about convincing society to devalue their workers, and that has worked perfectly.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 23 points 1 day ago

Not morons, sociopaths.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The executives who push for quarter to quarter earnings targets over any other metric. (For the bonus from shareholders)

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago

Union better bend them over a barrel because they will just try again

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their overpriced, bloated vehicles will now cost even more. Far from "leading edge", more like throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

Good thing for them they'll just get bailed out.

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a reminder that the previous article said that they are rehiring them not because humans are better at the job but because they rushed to fire them too fast, without using those people to train the computers first.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will soon learn that AI is actually more expensive to use than humans, when the AI companies are forced to raise prices in a frantic attempt to cover the actual costs of using and building datacenters.

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, but not before they try to fire people again, fafo cycle continues!

For this specific case they want to train local smaller models I think, like we didn't have that before the llm boom

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 23 hours ago

This is just the narrative they use to rationalize treating their workers worse, it need not and does not have any connection to reality.

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Well, I'm sure they'll bravely blaze a path into the future with their old employees.

I'm kidding, of course, they'll continue trying to figure out how to get rid of them.

The kicker is that eventually there will be no senior employees to hire, because no one ever hired or trained the juniors.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah let's fire people before we know if the new system even works. That's a great fucking plan.

Of course the people making these decisions never get fucking fired, and are in fact the ones that could easily be replaced by ai. In fact skip the "i" part.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't want to live on a planet where my existence slowly devolves into endlessly telling everyone "I told you so."

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m certain that everyone who isn’t invested in the AI industry told them this was a terrible idea. AI companies have worked extremely hard to oversell their capabilities, and large corporations are always frothing at the mouth to eliminate as many jobs as possible.

Labor is expensive. Expert labor: triply so. If there’s even a promise of a chance that corporations can eliminate the necessary expense of labor, they will take it.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I agree with you, I don't understand why all the companies seem to have switched to AI and fired their experts at the same time. If I was in charge of a company planning that massive a switch to a complete unknown, I'd run two systems in parallel to verify the results before getting rid of all my experts.

[–] taj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Because AI is expensive too. Can't afford to pay both.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

That was me in 2010... To right now.

One day I'll get over it.