this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
184 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30890 readers
1905 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dregan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Trump is perhaps the catalyst, but he is certainly not the reason.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I still have no idea how conservatives maintain this illusion that they are "gud aht 'conomee" when there is just so little evidence of it. I guess we can thank the Murc's Law Media for upholding that stupid narrative.

The economy was going in all the right directions by the end of 2024. And then this asshole "won". And all because people thought Biden was doing poorly on the economy.

I just can't even.

🙄

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

They are good at making their rich friends richer and burning through reserves/resources. They are also good at making racists feel heard. That combo has been very good for them

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah Biden was actually good on the economy. People have become so ignorant of economics they think there's a button the government has for "make economy good". Nope, the inflation was caused by the free market, Biden got it down without it turning into a recession, stuck the soft landing.

Trump could've done nothing and took credit for a good economy that he inherited from Biden. But instead he fucked it all up. He'll probably blame Biden for that and a lot of people will believe that. Or believe the "late stage capitalism" bullshit they consume from social media.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah Biden was actually good on the economy. People have become so ignorant of economics they think there’s a button the government has for “make economy good”. Nope, the inflation was caused by the free market, Biden got it down without it turning into a recession, stuck the soft landing.

Yeah. People ignore or conveniently forget the effects of Covid on both the supply chain and people getting stimulus checks to keep them whole. And then, Russia attacked Ukraine, disrupting the oil supply....none of these things were something Biden had much control over. Unlike donnie starting a war with Iran...

He’ll probably blame Biden for that and a lot of people will believe that.

They have been doing it since day one. I get that his idiot goons have to repeat that they were handed an economy that was like someone in the emergency room because a truck backed over them (laughing *the fuck *out loud at that one), but for others to buy that shit and then repeat it?

Or believe the “late stage capitalism” bullshit they consume from social media.

Yeah, that tends to be one of the things that make my eyes roll up in my head. I'm no super-fan of capitalism, but not everything is "late stage capitalism", FFS. I guess I was 14 once, too, but....Jesus. The amount of WELLAXTUALEEE people that pop up to do some half-assed armchair Communist critique after seemingly have read a pamphlet or watched some hot take is rather hilarious.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

Well I don't understand how the Great Depression wouldn't be late stage capitalism. It's just inconvenient for that narrative that the height of human prosperity happened during the 100 year period of late stage capitalism.

Really annoying because we could look at the policies that got us out of the great depression and say "why don't we try those things again?" Trust-busting, Keynesian economic policy, actually having wealthy people pay taxes, that kind of thing. Go with what works.

Thinking capitalism is an ideology is the problem. It's just buying and selling things really. Systems develop from that and those systems can be bad. So it needs regulation.

It's like a machine that needs maintenance. Not doing maintenance on a machine will result in it breaking down eventually, no matter how good the machine is. Libertarian types and socialist types both consider it ideology, one group thinking it's perfect and should be left alone, the other thinking it's evil and should be destroyed. Both groups are wrong. It's like saying a hammer is perfect and should be used for every job or saying a hammer is evil and should be destroyed. It's just a tool, people shouldn't get all emotional over it.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Nah, he probably won by rigging things so he'd win with Elon's help.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They only care about one thing, and it’s not the economy.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is the one thing Oil or China?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago

China. They’re trying to cut China off from resources, primarily oil.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

One man should not have so much impact and control. I'm exhausted already and am just circling, waiting for this phase of history to be behind us.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

He doesn't have that control. The "world" claim is false at face value.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I wish I knew when it will be over and if I'll live to see it. I fear after the dust settles, millions of people will still be oblivious that anything happened

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I don't even care if we make it anymore, just want this over

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so exhausted of global credit crises. It's fucking stupid we have to deal with this shit every 20 years like it's a recurring rash. Can we just agree none of this works, unplug it all and move on already?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

It is working, for the Sociopathic Oligarchs. As we've gotten poorer, they've gotten much richer. Our misery is their profit, and they have no intention of ending that.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm telling my kids not to worry, they're probably going to earn millions of dollars a month when they grow up.

I just don't tell them how a twinky will cost millions of dollars.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Also, Elon is saying money won't matter by 2036.

In the meantime, I guess everyone should give more of their money to Elon and donnie and their schemes.

[–] Canajan@piefed.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Hope everyone paid attention to the dirty 30’s chapter of history, because looks like we are bound to repeat it. Thanks to the Orange Turd.

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This will end well for everyone

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If "everyone" is anyone worth $100 mil+, then you're absolutely right!

[–] llamapocalypse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean, do the poors even count as people?

(/s in case that isn't blatantly obvious)

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

*child molesting rapist; people don't commit assault out of mere sexual attraction.

Yes! Also murderer, as indicated in the TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES (TM)

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't we just send Trump to the moon and leave him there? I bet he'd go willingly

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It worked for Napoleon.

[–] echo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's working exactly as planned...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

When it's not working, it's working.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip -1 points 19 hours ago

Well no. It is not Trump's fault that other countries are bought in. He does not control them; they have their own leaders.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

except the credit agencies are dropping their ratings and the bond markets are forcing higher rates and the debt keeps climbing and the gov keeps bailing out and waiting money and foreign markets are divesting and so on.

[–] Neocorporation@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What does this article mean when the markets are bad, Trump always turns back? No he doesn't, he just goes bankrupt...

Trump is going to bankrupt the world at this rate.