this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1699 readers
44 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone unlocked this story for you. Log in to read for free.

Nice try, New York Times.

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't need to login to assume they'll somehow blame Canada.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I immediately thought tarrifs must be killing US alcohol manufacturers, because that is something that is easily replaceable... but the first sentence was about declining alcohol sales, which can't help either.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Pinot Noir was trendy because of that movie, but never had a chance as a mass market grape because to make good wine from it is very expensive.

There’s a reason white zinfandel moves cases year after year.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because no one wants your wine, and you can’t afford to drink it.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn’t wine keep well in storage though?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

IIRC, rule of thumb is 90% of wine should be consumed within a year. A minority of types do benefit from aging but it's an outdated stereotype.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago

But it only goes up in price, and Americans cannot afford it already. Aging it won’t help sell it.

[–] fake_meows@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

A couple of months ago there was a post here about the Australian government subsidizing wineries to grow product to create alcohol to use for vehicle fuel, so that the wineries had a market. Otherwise they made more wine than what the demand would use.