baltakatei

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 days ago

Which website gave you those instructions? Name and shame.

 

Dated: 2025-03-30. Added: 2025-04-31.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

Promise him eternal life if they let us freeze him in a cryonics facility and then let his loyalists maintain the freezer with his disembodied head in a jar figure out how to make him their God emperor or whatever.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 days ago (4 children)

As a member of the Navajo Nation, I prefer leaders who believe in rule of law. They're the ones least likely to try and nullify peace treaties on a whim.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago (12 children)

It only takes one person to make 1 cubic meter of black hole to destroy the biosphere by ripping Earth into an acretion disc.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

The direct counter to enshittification is interoperability: the ability to pack up your content (likes, followers, messages, uploads) and import it into another service provider.

Since Signal is open source and mostly FOSS, you can theoretically create a Signal fork that can import Signal backups. I know because this program can read such backups and convert them into other formats. Ideally, the Atlantic reporter could have exported a Signal backup with the offending group chat messages before they expired.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Donate if you regularly use Syncthing. Help close the causal loop.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago
[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Metaphorically, the US does this every election cycle, hot swapping elected officials peacefully, usually without replacing incumbents. However, the problem is that your kid brother insists on trying the same corroded cartridges again and again because he loves seeing you squirm in frustration more than actually having a functioning system. Also, you don't get to play until he gets a game over while you, in contrast, are on a set time limit.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 56 points 2 weeks ago

Tech bro billionaires are the only geniuses on earth

Relevant excerpt from The Internet Con (2023) by Cory Doctorow about the folly of thinking tech CEO monopolies are justified due to merit. Later in the book, Doctorow explains how the recent (since the Reagan presidency) appearance of big tech monopolies was instead due to failure of the US DOJ and FTC to enforce anti-trust laws after Robert Bork successfully lobbied to have the Chicago School of economics's consumer welfare doctrine (monopolies can be good if companies pinky promise to lower prices for consumers; see Bork's 1978 book The Antitrust Paradox) adopted by the US Supreme Court.

from Chapter 1If tech were led by exceptional geniuses whose singular vision made it impossible to unseat them, then you’d expect that the structure of the tech industry itself would be exceptional. That is, you’d expect that tech’s mass-extinction event, which turned the wild and wooly web into a few giant websites, was unique to tech, driven by those storied geniuses.

But that’s not the case at all. Nearly every industry in the world looks like the tech industry: dominated by a handful of giant companies that emerged out of a cataclysmic, forty-year die-off of smaller firms which either failed or were folded into the surviving giants.

Here’s a partial list of concentrated industries from the Open Markets Institute—industries where between one and five companies account for the vast majority of business: pharmaceuticals, health insurers, appliances, athletic shoes, defense contractors, book publishing, booze, drug stores, office supplies, eyeglasses, LCD glass, glass bottles, vitamin C, car parts, bottle caps, airlines, railroads, mattresses, Lasik lasers, cowboy boots and candy.

If tech’s consolidation is down to the exceptional genius of its leaders, then they are part of a bumper crop of exceptional geniuses who all managed to rise to prominence in their respective firms and then steer them into positions where they crushed, bought or sidelined all their competitors over the past forty years or so.

Occam’s Razor posits that the simplest explanation is most likely to be true. For that reason, I think we can safely reject the idea that sunspots, water contaminants or gamma rays caused an exceptional generation of business leaders to be conceived all at the same time, all over the world.

Likewise, I am going to discount the possibility that, in the 1970s and 1980s, aliens came to Earth and knocked up the future mothers of a new subrace of elite CEOs whose extraterrestrial DNA conferred upon them the power to steer companies to total industrial dominance.

Not only do those explanations stretch the imagination, but they also ignore a simpler, far more tangible explanation for the incredible die-off of businesses in every industry. Forty years ago, countries all over the world altered the basis on which they enforced their competition laws—often called “antitrust” laws—to be more tolerant of monopolies. Forty years later, we have a lot of monopolies.

These facts are related.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Relevant excerpt from part 11 of Anathem (2008) by Neal Stephenson:

Artificial InanityNote: Reticulum=Internet, syndev=computer, crap~=spam

“Early in the Reticulum—thousands of years ago—it became almost useless because it was cluttered with faulty, obsolete, or downright misleading information,” Sammann said.

“Crap, you once called it,” I reminded him.

“Yes—a technical term. So crap filtering became important. Businesses were built around it. Some of those businesses came up with a clever plan to make more money: they poisoned the well. They began to put crap on the Reticulum deliberately, forcing people to use their products to filter that crap back out. They created syndevs whose sole purpose was to spew crap into the Reticulum. But it had to be good crap.”

“What is good crap?” Arsibalt asked in a politely incredulous tone.

“Well, bad crap would be an unformatted document consisting of random letters. Good crap would be a beautifully typeset, well-written document that contained a hundred correct, verifiable sentences and one that was subtly false. It’s a lot harder to generate good crap. At first they had to hire humans to churn it out. They mostly did it by taking legitimate documents and inserting errors—swapping one name for another, say. But it didn’t really take off until the military got interested.”

“As a tactic for planting misinformation in the enemy’s reticules, you mean,” Osa said. “This I know about. You are referring to the Artificial Inanity programs of the mid–First Millennium A.R.”

“Exactly!” Sammann said. “Artificial Inanity systems of enormous sophistication and power were built for exactly the purpose Fraa Osa has mentioned. In no time at all, the praxis leaked to the commercial sector and spread to the Rampant Orphan Botnet Ecologies. Never mind. The point is that there was a sort of Dark Age on the Reticulum that lasted until my Ita forerunners were able to bring matters in hand.”

“So, are Artificial Inanity systems still active in the Rampant Orphan Botnet Ecologies?” asked Arsibalt, utterly fascinated.

“The ROBE evolved into something totally different early in the Second Millennium,” Sammann said dismissively.

“What did it evolve into?” Jesry asked.

“No one is sure,” Sammann said. “We only get hints when it finds ways to physically instantiate itself, which, fortunately, does not happen that often. But we digress. The functionality of Artificial Inanity still exists. You might say that those Ita who brought the Ret out of the Dark Age could only defeat it by co-opting it. So, to make a long story short, for every legitimate document floating around on the Reticulum, there are hundreds or thousands of bogus versions—bogons, as we call them.”

“The only way to preserve the integrity of the defenses is to subject them to unceasing assault,” Osa said, and any idiot could guess he was quoting some old Vale aphorism.

“Yes,” Sammann said, “and it works so well that, most of the time, the users of the Reticulum don’t know it’s there. Just as you are not aware of the millions of germs trying and failing to attack your body every moment of every day. However, the recent events, and the stresses posed by the Antiswarm, appear to have introduced the low-level bug that I spoke of.”

“So the practical consequence for us,” Lio said, “is that—?”

“Our cells on the ground may be having difficulty distinguishing between legitimate messages and bogons. And some of the messages that flash up on our screens may be bogons as well.”

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

AudioAnchor + Syncthing for Android via F-Droid has been my mobile audiobook app stack. Takes some setting up and concatenating audiobook mp3s into mkv's for convenience, but I haven't had to touch it since... 2020?

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago

I recall a joke thought experiment me and some friends in high school had when discussing how answer keys for final exams were created. Multiple choice answer keys are easy to imagine: just lists of letters A through E. However, when we considered the essay portion of final exams, we joked that perhaps we could just be presented with five entire completed essays and be tasked with identifying, A through E, the essay that best answered the prompt. All without having to write a single word of prose.

It seems that that joke situation is upon us.

 

The objective of this Lemmy community is maximize the number of New York Times articles non-subscribers can read via the gift article feature provided to subscribers. If two people create gift links for the same article, one is basically wasted, so check here in case the article you want to share already has a gift link.

New York Times gift articles automatically expire after 30 days.


El propósito de esta comunidad de Lemmy, es acrecentar a lo sumo la cantidad de escritos del New York Times que los no suscriptores pueden leer, por medio de la función de artículo obsequiado que se ha dado a quienes son suscriptores. Si dos personas crean enlaces de regalo para un mismo escrito, uno es, en esencia, desaprovechado, así que verifica aquí por si acaso el artículo que deseas compartir ya ha sido obsequiado con un enlace.

Los artículos de regalo del New York Times fenecen automáticamente al cabo de 30 días.


本Lemmy社区的目标是最大化非纽约时报订阅者通过订阅者提供的赠送文章功能阅读文章的数量。如果两个人为同一篇文章创建赠送链接,那么其中一个链接基本上就被浪费了,所以在分享文章之前,请先在这里检查你想分享的文章是否已经有了赠送链接。

纽约时报的赠送文章在30天后会自动过期。


Tämän Lemmy-yhteisön tavoitteena on maksimoida se määrä New York Timesin artikkeleita, joita ei-tilaajat voivat lukea hyödyntämällä tilaajille tarjottua lahja-artikkelitoimintoa. Jos kaksi henkilöä luo lahjalinkkejä samasta artikkelista, toinen on käytännössä hukkaan heitetty, joten tarkista täältä, jos haluat jakaa artikkelin, jolla on jo lahjalinkki.

New York Timesin lahja-artikkelit vanhenevat automaattisesti 30 päivän kuluttua.


Edit: Note that links will not be removed.

view more: next ›