this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
498 points (98.6% liked)

196

6806 readers
2032 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt TextA thread of the posts by @cait.bsky.social. They read as follows:

I had my first talk therapy session with my new therapist and she hit me with the "you're very self-aware" ☹️

not the "pleasure to have in class" of therapy

that's right, I know all the tools and have developed countertools so they no longer work. welcome to thunderdome

Link to post

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Therapy will not fix anything if you're unwilling to make the effort to change.

At this point, if you still lack motivation, maybe it's time to go the medication route. It helped me overcome the inertia.

[–] PeacefulShadows@aussie.zone 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so done with therapy. I've been going since 1989 and whilst there have certainly been some worthwhile insights, I believe the whole thing is as much about propping up the economic stakeholders (the 'industry') as it is about effective help. It's a lazy no-effort button GPs, employers, friends, anyone, can press to rid themselves of listening to your 'problems'. So you pin all your hopes on it to find relief. It's such a let down.

There are so many issues. Firstly, it is situated with a culture. A western capitalist culture. I reckon it's all about making you feel less like the obvious wage/mortgage slave you are and more like an 'empowered' 'aspirational' boss. CBT is definitely gaslighting. But the biggest elephant in the room is how the 80% of your problem -- the societal and market forces pushing down on you -- are never referenced as the cause. They are scarcely offered an a discussion point. Like, the very thing which fucks you up is indiscussible. It's always what 'you' can do. Basicallly it's: 'you've got an attitude problem'.

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

CBT is definitely gaslighting.

More of us need to start saying this. All therapists are powerless to help you with the existential angst inherent to living within a Western capitalist system, but many of them will flat out deny that current material and economic conditions are a root cause of many societal problems that lead to chronic stress and mental illness.

CBT is jank as fuck. You can't reframe your way out of poverty, especially not once you start developing physiological issues related to chronic stress and depression. The notion of it is offensive to me, and the CBT worksheets I was given are the epitome of paternalism. What a waste of time. I have had some luck with using DBT strategies on my own though, and I'm hoping to get referred to a DBT therapy group. Group/peer support has been more helpful than I had thought it would be.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ok but it's great for what it's great for. CBT can't fix poverty, but it can fix a tendency to let minor setbacks spiral into full blown panic attacks or an inability to ask loved ones for help.

Plenty of problems aren't the sort therapy can help with despite them having huge mental effects. But plenty of people have problems therapy is actively good for. In the same way therapy won't fix your (rational) economic anxiety, if you torpedo every relationship you're in communism won't fix you, but DBT might.

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That's great for the people for whom talk therapy and CBT is effective, but the point of my comment and presumably the point of the comment I replied to is that talk therapy using CBT is the de facto standard in the West even when it harms people.

Again, happy that the CBT-lovers have found their thing, but those of us that find it patronizing and minimizing to be told we're what's wrong (for CBT not working like it does for others) instead of the clinical framework not being right for us should have the right to push back against clinicians and pro-therapy laypeople placing specific models of care on a pedestal.

If you can't see that CBT is being applied as a one-size-fits-all solution, especially for young adults and at free/subsidized municipal clinics (who have clients highly affected by poverty and minority stressors), I really don't know what to tell you. It's harmful to people but you feel like you can't talk about it because then people think you're either entirely anti-therapy, antisocial/defiant, or drug-seeking.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Ok cool, you're absolutely not taking my argument as I made it. I was acknowledging that it's bad for several things it's bad for (implying it's commonly prescribed for those things) but also acknowledging that it's worth accepting that it's good for what it's good for. Maybe it's bad for some people who have problems it's good for. But I've seen people who desperately need the skills it teaches parrot the rhetoric of it being useless and harmful before so I do feel a desire to speak up in its defense as well.

Hopefully you'll get what you need, regardless of what it is. And yeah, poor people disproportionately need financial assistance more than training to see cognitive distortions.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't negotiate with therapists.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We don't negotiate with the rapists

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

I’ll take “The rapists” for 400

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

A series of circumstances have made me effectively resistant to CBT, and sadly not the kick-based one. "Talk to yourself as you would to a friend", they say to the dude who has never had any and therefore has no idea of whay does that even mean

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

“Talk to yourself as you would to a friend”

I've never heard of this technique. The one CBT technique that I know is labeling your thoughts (according to the type of cognitive distortion) and countering them. If you do it long enough, your thinking is supposed to change. Changing any habit is difficult, though.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think the idea is that, when you're judging yourself really hard for something you've done, you're asked to consider what you would think of a friend who had done the same thing. A lot of the time people would view the friend as having a made a forgivable mistake, even though they're treating the behavior in themselves as evidence of an irredeemable and permanent character flaw. So it's like, use supportive language when you talk to yourself. Remind yourself of all you've done right and all you've overcome, that sort of thing. Forgive yourself and build yourself up. It's a specific instance of the kind of labeling-and-countering you're talking about.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's also that what you want out of the friend is not for them to run away or apologize profusely, it's to own up, apologize, and try to be better next time

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, good call. I meant to have a line about that. You would help a friend get over the blame and self-criticism and get to the actual business of changing for the better.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Ask you doctor if stoicism is right for you.

[–] the_q@piefed.social 63 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Stoicism is just sparkling loneliness.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skunk@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Stoicism is just dissociating philosophically

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"I am not my feelings and have control of my actions beyond them" is nothing like disassociating

[–] skunk@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Sorry i was just trying to be funny. Most of these "stoic lone warrior" types do just use it to act tough by repressing emotions though

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

You could try needles or sounding or a cage. Kicks aren't the only option!

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Talk to yourself as you would to a friend

I prefer to be honest with myself. While I don't saddle my friends with my problems.

[–] mirshafie 14 points 1 day ago

The point is to be kind to yourself. You should be honest with your friends, but you should make efforts to frame that honesty in a caring and positive light, ensuring them that they're safe with you and that you're raising your concerns out of love for them.

The therapist's point is that most people know to treat they're friends that way, but tend to be much harsher and less generous with themselves. So: cut yourself some slack, is the message.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

When I had friends we’d constantly insult each other.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 day ago (14 children)

wait what? isnt... being self-aware a good thing?... pleasure to have in class? i have got to beissing something here.

[–] translucent_tube@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"You're very self-aware" is basically a meme in the corners of the internet that discuss trauma. It's a genuine compliment on the part of the therapist, but also an implied admission that they won't be able to help you.

You're already aware of the observations they would make and the tools they would propose, so you might as well skip to the end and look for another therapist.

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

oooooh wow.... gosh yea... thanks for sharing.

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 17 points 23 hours ago

As a psychotherapist, working with people who are self-aware is a pleasure. I wouldn't ever say that to someone if not meant as a genuine compliment.

Although I believe not many of our patients actually are as self aware as they think. I think we as humans often are good in introspection where it's easy and comfortable to do so, while glaring over pretty blatant cognitive errors in some other parts, and this is usually where problems arise and disorders develop. And interestingly some people seem to think of themselves as someone who's perfectly introspective but just for some external, unchangeable factor immune to any kind of positive change. Maybe they could feel irritated about the compliment, because in their minds it reinfoces their idea of being helpless against their problems (in the sense of: I already know everything, it's just not possible to change anything or I would've already done that)? I could imagine that's how I would feel, but of course it's just a guess.

[–] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Self-awareness is a good thing, but it’s also the bottom of the barrel when fishing for compliments. In therapy, specifically, the implied sentiment is, “Well, at least you know how fucked up you are.”

She’s making the comparison to the “pleasure to have in class” line, because it’s similar. If a teacher genuinely has good things to say about a student, it’s probably going to be more specific (i.e. – they were inquisitive, a quick study, made their peers laugh, etc). “Pleasure to have in class,” by contrast, is a generic compliment that doesn’t really say anything.

EDIT: Okay, so based on a few of the latest responses, I felt that I should clarify something. I don’t think people who use these phrases intend for them to be insults or demeaning in any way—this includes Cait’s therapist in the original post. It’s just that it can be perceived that way, which is what I think the post was making fun of.

If you’re also an introspective, self-critical person, please don’t take someone saying this to you as an affirmation of your faults. It’s almost certainly an innocuous and genuine observation.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

but it’s also the bottom of the barrel when fishing for compliments.

I can see that you have good intentions...

Really, though, there is no bottom of the barrel. Self-awareness is something that some people in therapy genuinely lack. Good intentions are something that some people genuinely lack. Kindness is something that someone people genuinely lack. Being capable of being unobtrusive for others is something some people genuinely lack.

These are not the bottom of the barrel, but solid foundations you can build from. Someone with good self-awareness can give constructive feedback both in session and irl. Someone with good intentions will actually try to improve rather than use therapy as a place to vent. Someone who is kind will use the skills and motivation they gain in therapy to build a nice community for themselves because it is reciprocal.

Imagine OOP except without self-awareness. Their subconscious has developed countertools that make therapy ineffective but they are not able to describe those countertools or even know their functioning. All they can say is that the therapy doesn't work. That sucks so much worse than the situation OOP is actually in.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›