this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
963 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6566 readers
878 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carddamom@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because they like TSA fingering their assholes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

The US public transportation, especially the passenger rail network is fucking pathetic.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

Train infrastructure is so underfunded (thx oil) that you can still get the fingering at most train stations for a really reasonable fee.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I live in South Korea and HSRs are pretty much the only mode of (intercity) transportation that is relevant. Buses take too long, planes are expensive, while HSR(KTX)s are marginally cheaper than buses and take about ⅔ of a time.

Of course, our country's much much smaller than US/Canada so even the farthest lane takes only about 2.5 hours. It's pretty cool.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Something something Hungarian National Railway fucking useless once you go further than a 100 kms from the capital city.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Rail is hard if it's from one country to another (I think Europe is the exception)

In my case, I have to take rail from Ankara to Edirne, Edirne to Bucharest, Bucharest to Vienna, and after Vienna I can access anywhere in Europe

The problem is, going from Edirne to Bucharest requires two visas

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Even in the EU there are still some difficulties. Like Finland and Estonia are on broad gauge not standard gauge. So their network isn’t connected to the rest of the EU. Spain and French haven’t connected their high speed rail network because of some dispute. So you have to get off at the border take a slow train across the border than walk to another platform to get on the other train.

Also rules says the crew needs to speak the local language of the country the train drives trough and traffic rules vary by country so if the driver doesn’t speak the language or doesn’t know the rules they need to change drivers when a train crosses a border which adds more delays.

Problem is also that there are still many rail networks in Europe that are privately owned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShittDickk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Crackheads will steal the copper from the rail and cause a 30 car derailment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Dane here. While I love trains, they are a) more expensive than flying in almost every long distance scenario, and b) take much longer. We are trialling sleeping trains but reception is mixed and capacity limited. People don't like to waste an extra 2-4 days of their vacation on travel. Especially if they're paying more for that privilege. I should note that this isn't an issue of imbalanced subsidies. The EU subsidises air travel (in many ways) to the tune of around €30–40 billion annually depending on what you include and what you consider to be a "subsidy." Using similar criteria, rail is subsidised to the tune of €40–75 billion per year. So rail gets a lot more investment despite it serving 16% fewer travel kilometers per year in the EU than air travel.

The thing is, if even we can't make it cheaper and faster despite our relatively high population densities and high rail subsidies, I fear the case is much harder still in the U.S. My personal position is that trains are excellent commuter alternatives, and should be liberally built and subsidised in all dense cities. For longer travel, there is no substitute for airoplanes.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (21 children)

The cost of dedicated passenger rail lines is staggering, and the US has a LOT of ground to cover.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago

I kind of like the thought of me pissing in the train and it travelling 300+ kph sideways and 9.8 m/s² downwards

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›