this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
153 points (99.4% liked)

You Should Know

39244 readers
202 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most people either use google as their search engine, or one of the "privacy friendly ones" (ddg, qwant, brave, startpage, ...), or use self hosted or publicly available metasearch engines, like searxng, or whoogle, etc.

This websites lists out websites which have their own indexes, and which depend on big providers.

Why YSK?

It is good for your privacy to not use a big provider like google, which now prefers to serve you ai generated ssummaries, which are based on a few giant websites, and this is not good for a open web.

I am also a person who almost always uses "(insert query) reddit" to get better results, because I mostly do not want SEO spam, and reddit results used to be human generated content. Now even that is hit and miss. Also, reddit made a deal with google, so for newer results from reddit, you can only get them from google.

Then we have the "privacy friendly ones" which most of the time are wrappers for other bigger indexes, for example ddg famously uses bing, brave "suppliments" (read this suppliments as almost always) it's results from google, startpage is basically a google frontend, etc. Brave, qwant, and few others also claim to have their own indexes, but they are small and not rich as google and bing. Also, wwhen you think about it - what is their business model - how do they get money for the search apis - most either serve ads or have some form of tracking. Also, bing has "kinda" closed it's search api (not really clear about this), so many of these privacy friendly options will have to either switch to google, or only serve using their indexes.

Meta-search engines kinda seem like better options, as you can run searxng on your own machine, or use the public ones, but it still has problems. You are still bringing the big providers traffic, which makes their advertisement clients happier and prefer them over smaller search engines. If you use a public instance, then it is good for your privacy, but the public instance would now generate a lot traffic, and often get banned or rate limited, and hence you can not rely on them. If you use your personal instances (I did this for a long time), you will still be tracked as your IP is still visible. You avoid their annoying ui and popups but still are tracked.

So what should you use?

You can only decide this. I would prefer something which has a reasonable business model - if they do advertisement, that should ideally be non tracking. Ideally their client and server code should be foss (so you can verify their claims), or have paid plans or apis if you do not want ads.

For example, Kagi has only paid plans, but I do not prefer or use them, because they are expensive (5 dollars for 300 searches per month or something similar. I am from one of third world countries, and 5 dollars is a lot. plus 300 searches seem less to me) but that is subjective, and your privacy has a price, so this is not neccessarily a objectively bad thing. But their code is closed source, and they do not completely use their own indexes.

I have also used Mullvad's Leta search engine for about a month, and they are now effectively frontends for brave search or google (you can choose). Their business plan initially was that Leta was only available to their VPN clients, and VPN subscription would supplement the search cost. Now they have it available for free, so I do not really understand their business plan (maybe the number of clients they have is large enough, and number of leta users is small, that they can afford to run leta for loss, and maybe as possible advertisement for mullvad. Mullvad to me is a good privacy centric company. I am not their client, but they seem to be trust worthy. You can try them, but you would still support some big provider.

You can also try the independent search providers listed in the article. They are often small, serve bad (subjectively speaking; your taste regarding search engines is also heavily tuned to google like results because of years of exposure to it) results, but using them also supports open web (you would often find that these smaller providers do not have good indexes for big websites, and sometimes it is intentional, sometimes it is a byproduct of them being careful, or the websites banning/rate limiting then).

I have now started trying stract, and will try others too. You should also consider trying some independent search engines.

In my personal case - I have a offline setup where I have large sections of wikipedia and a few other websites (like programning language docs, or my favorite manga wiki, will be adding much of stack overflow soon) available offline, and I use my custon launcher to search through them (faster then searching them online). I bookmark a lot of sites (~ 2000) and do this to stop searching the same stuff over and over again. This has reduced at least 30-40% of all my searches. But I still need a search engine for anything I do not have currently, or stuff I do not/ can not get. I am trying stract, because it is open source, they seen to have some fine plans for business in future (non tracking, current search term related ads or subscription service ; currenlty they are running on previous funding from nlnet); search results are acceptable (not good, but servicable); and finally - it is written in RUST (I an a rust fan). I am not affiliated with the project, but just spreading a good word because I just found them, and could not find much online.

PS: I am not used to writing much, and not a good typist. Please forgive the brevity. Feel free to correct me, both on spellings and content

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some excellent advice, this is a really great post!

Personally I've opted to stick with DDG for now, its some what centred around privacy, whilst thats probably not much when it comes to tracking I at least appreciate the illusion. Search works good enough about 90% of the time and it allows you to easily switch off the AI BS so you can search the web like a normal search engine.

I've used others like Ecosia which I thought was not terrible but not great either. I used searchxng for a while and the results were always much more interesting but I would find it to be a bit more unreliable. I also tried Gibiru which I found to be one of the better privacy central search engines, it was fairly reliable but also had a good balance of unique results too.

Kagi, I tried this out but there is something about this search engine which I just don't like. I get the whole idea of paying for it because they don't sell your data but something about it just feels shady and a bit like a cash grab on people who are eager for a privacy focused situation but don't want to think about it too hard.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It may be, but the search results are also so much better and you can rank them yourself.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I finally started paying this month after using up my 300 trial searches. It's just so much less hostile than google and better than ddg

[–] Rudee@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago

I am currently using Gibiru (a Searxng frontend by Murena; also known for their /e/OS android operating system), but have been toying with the idea of running my own Searxng on my home server

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Very much a hit or miss, but I’ve enjoyed the marginalia search index.

Otherwise I just use duckduckgo for simplicity’s sake. But when I want a non-commercial result marginalia is my go-to.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 2 points 6 days ago

i have tried them, but can not use them as first either. but it is fun to sometimes search stuff on it and it goes off the rails

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You are still bringing the big providers traffic

gonna be honest, this falls under the "no ethical consumption" bit for me. someone's gonna get my traffic and ad revenue, i might as well get the best results for it. And to be honest, the best results i've had have been with paid, industry specific search engines. It removes some of the emotional barrier i've got toward trying some of the paid services like Kagi, just i'm on a pretty tight budget. $5/mo for 300 searches (do your unused searches roll over to the next month?) means i have to cut back somewhere, and we have been doing that month after month after month. A search engine just is not worth eating less. (note i did not say eating out less).

search engines seem to be going the way of streaming sites. if you know where-ish to look, you can put the search in there. but there's no good general, has everything except specialized knowledge search engine that i've found.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 3 points 5 days ago

fair point, you currently have to compromise on either "ethics" (a bit stronger word than I would like to use) or result quality. My only try is to promote independent engines in hope to improve them such that market gets more competitive

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

thanks, fixed

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ecosia is developing an index with qwant

[–] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 5 days ago

That would be great. I did hear the news of their joint venture, but have not heard anything since. If anything comes out of this, that would be great

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Ddg has terrible results. I switched from google to ff because of ubo. But I’m always open to something better.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 2 points 5 days ago

I can only suggest you to try the engines in the linked article, maybe something serves your wants better

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Ddg is bing with a lot of the tracking removed. It’s good for images and quick news searches (remember to add “-msn” otherwise microsquash will fuck that up too).