this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Balatro

1239 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to Balatro Lemmy and Mbin Community.

This community is for the game Balatro, which is developed by LocalThunk and published by Playstack. For more Balatro conversation, please head to the stickied FAQ and check out the official Discord channel. Also make sure you read our rules before posting.

Rules:


Official Links

Unofficial Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/152735

On Friday, the YouTube channel Balatro University posted a video highlighting how some of their videos had recently been age-restricted after the company tightened its policies about gambling content. But in a post Monday night, YouTube said the restrictions shouldn’t have been applied.

“Videos featuring Balatro gameplay should not be age-restricted,” YouTube says in a post on X.  We’re reviewing the age-restrictions on these videos and conducting a platform-wide review. Thanks for your patience as we fix!”

TY for flagging! Videos featuring Balatro gameplay should not be age-restricted. We're reviewing the age-restrictions on these videos and conducting a platform-wide review. Thanks for your patience as we fix!

— TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) April 8, 2025

YouTube’s post is a reply to Balatro’s anonymous developer, LocalThunk, who shared the Balatro University video Monday afternoon. “Good thing we are protecting children from knowing what a 4 of a kind is and letting them watch [Counter-Strike] case opening videos instead,” LocalThunk said.

Balatro, a roguelike that borrows ideas from poker, doesn’t actually involve gambling. But the game received a PEGI 18 rating in Europe after it launched because it “contains prominent gambling imagery and material that instructs about gambling,” as quoted by publisher Playstack at the time. LocalThunk also expressed his displeasure with that rating.

However, in February, PEGI revised Balatro’s rating to PEGI 12 following an appeal and said it would “develop a more granular set of classification criteria to handle gambling themes and the simulation, teaching and glamorisation of gambling in different age categories.”


From The Verge via this RSS feed

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here